ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 07.04.2016 Auto

CASE OF KARAGJOZI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

RESPONDENT
ALB
HOTĂRÂRE
07.04.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF KARAGJOZI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

La 28 iulie 2006, Comisia Vlora a recunoscut, printre altele, drepturile de proprietate moștenite ale reclamanților peste o parcelă de terenuri care măsoară 640.000 mp. Deoarece plățile de teren au fost ocupate, reclamanții ar fi compensate într-unul dintre modalitățile prevăzute de lege. Comisia a declarat că terenurile și-au schimbat destinația de la terenuri agricole la terenuri de construcție. O notă scrisă semnată de președintele Comisiei prevede că decizia a devenit finală la 2 octombrie 2006. La 18 februarie 2013, după cererea reclamanților de informații privind dacă proprietatea lor a fost încă ocupată, Ministerul Apărării a afirmat că parcela a fost ocupată de armată. Până în prezent, nu s-a plătit nicio compensație.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-11-10
0,93
CASE OF SHARRA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
would be compensated in one of the ways provided by law. 29. To date, no compensation has been paid. 30. On 10 August 2007 the Agency for Restitution and Compensation of Property (“the Agency”), which had replaced the Commission, recognised
CtEDO 2014-04-08
0,93
CASE OF KARAGJOZI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
the plot of land measuring 7,727 sq. m was occupied by buildings belonging to the Urban Transportation Company (“UTC”) pursuant to a sale contract of 1994 concluded between the UTC and the National Privatisation Agency. The Commission indic
CtEDO 2016-04-07
0,91
CASE OF HALIMI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
applicants’ inherited property rights over a plot of land measuring 10,000 sq. m. Since the plot of land was occupied, the applicants would be compensated in one of the ways provided by law. 5. To date, no compensation has been paid. II. RE
CtEDO 2022-11-10
0,91
XHACKA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
was taken in respect of the remaining plot of land (440 sq. m). The applicant requested the reopening of the administrative procedure, in particular as regards this remaining plot of land of 440 sq. m. A decision of 23 October 2008 issued b
CtEDO 2015-07-16
0,91
CASE OF METALLA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
On 13 August 2007 the Durrës Commission recognised the applicants’ inherited title to a plot of land measuring 65,000 sq. m of which 60,000 sq. m were restored to them. Since the remaining land measuring 5,000 sq. m consisted of arable land
Sursă