CtEDO 07.06.2016 AI

CASE OF KARABEYOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
07.06.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF KARABEYOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul cererilor inadmisibil (articolul 35-3-a - Ratione personae); Nicio încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (articolul 8-1 - Respectarea corespondenței; Respectarea vieții private); Încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (articolul 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private); Încălcare a articolului 13 - Dreptul la un recurs efectiv (articolul 13 - Recurs efectiv); Daune patrimoniale - cerere respinsă (articolul 41 - Daune patrimoniale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune morale - acordare (articolul 41 - Daune morale).

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,98
CASE OF KARABEYOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,97
Karabeyoğlu v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,96
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,94
CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,94
İrfan Güzel v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
Sursă