CtEDO 20.11.2018 AI

CASE OF GÜNANA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
20.11.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Just satisfaction dismissed (out of time) (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF GÜNANA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne; Încălcarea articolului 10 - Libertatea de exprimare - {general} (Articolul 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare); Încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la judecată echitabilă (Articolul 6 - Proceduri de executare; Articolul 6-1 - Dreptul la o audiere echitabilă); Daune patrimoniale - pretenție respingă (Articolul 41 - Daune patrimoniale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune morale - acordate (Articolul 41 - Daune morale; Satisfacție echitabilă); Satisfacție echitabilă respingă (în afara termenului) (Articolul 41 - Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-11-20
0,98
CASE OF GÜNANA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tr
CtEDO 2019-04-16
0,95
CASE OF ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of A
CtEDO 2017-03-07
0,95
CASE OF DÖNER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Brought promptly before judge or other office
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,95
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,95
CASE OF EMİNAĞAOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Tribunal established by law);Violation
Sursă