CtEDO 20.03.2018 AI

CASE OF MEHMET HASAN ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
20.03.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention;Speediness of review);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MEHMET HASAN ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiectie preliminară unită pe fond și respinsă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne;Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei;Încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-1 - Arestare sau detenție legală;Procedură prevăzută de lege;Articolul 5-1-c - Suspiciune rezonabilă);Nicio încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (Articolul 5-4 - Control asupra legalității detenției;Celeritate în control);Încălcare a articolului 10 - Libertatea de exprimare-{în general} (Articolul 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare);Prejudiciu imaterial - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu imaterial;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,98
CASE OF MEHMET HASAN ALTAN v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,98
CASE OF ȘAHİN ALPAY v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2018-03-20
0,97
Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2019-04-16
0,97
CASE OF ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of A
CtEDO 2021-04-13
0,96
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right
Sursă