CtEDO 07.02.2017 AI

CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
07.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (Articolul 35-3-a - Manifestă lipsă de temei); Nici o violare a Articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea corespondenței; Respectarea vieții private); Violare a Articolului 13+8 - Dreptul la un remediu efectiv (Articolul 13 - Remediu efectiv) (Articolul 8-1 - Respectarea corespondenței; Respectarea vieții private; Articolul 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale); Daune pecuniare - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Daune pecuniare; Satisfacție echitabilă); Daune morale - constatarea violării suficientă (Articolul 41 - Daune morale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,98
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,96
İrfan Güzel v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,96
CASE OF KARABEYOĞLU v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respec
CtEDO 2018-11-20
0,95
CASE OF GÜNANA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair tr
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,94
Karabeyoğlu v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect
Sursă