ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 21.06.2016 Auto

CASE OF MAMONTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT

RUS

HOTĂRÂRE

21.06.2016

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF MAMONTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2016)

HUDOC · oficial

Toți reclamanții au fost vizați în operațiunile sub acoperire efectuate de poliție sub formă de achiziții de teste de droguri în conformitate cu art. 7 și 8 din Legea privind activitățile de căutare operațională din 12 august 1995 (nr. 144-FZ). Aceste operațiuni au dus la condamnările lor penale pentru traficul de droguri. Reclamanții nu sunt de acord cu condamnările lor și au susținut că poliția le-a incitat să comită infracțiuni legate de droguri. De asemenea, ei se plângeau că nu puteau examina martorii care mărturiseau împotriva lor.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2012-11-09

MAMONTOV v. RUSSIA

FIRST SECTION Application no. 46796/06 Vladislav Borisovich MAMONTOV against Russia lodged on 3 October 2006 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Vladislav Borisovich Mamontov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1976 and lives in Tambov

CtEDO 2010-11-04

CASE OF BANNIKOVA v. RUSSIA

ed sale (Article 30 § 3 in conjunction with Article 228.1 of the Criminal Code). It also set out the following conditions on which the results of the test purchase could be admitted as evidence in criminal proceedings: (i) they must have be

CtEDO 2015-09-22

SHUMEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

1. The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. The numbers and dates of lodging of their applications, and their full names, dates of birth and places of residence are set out in the Appendix. 2

CtEDO 2015-04-30

CASE OF SERGEY LEBEDEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

of the Convention as amended by Protocol No. 14, the applications were assigned to a Committee of three Judges. It was also decided that the Committee would rule on the admissibility and merits of the applications at the same time. THE FACT

CtEDO 2016-03-15

CASE OF YEGOROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicants each alleged that they had been convicted of drug offences following entrapment by the police in violation of Article 6 of the Convention. 4. On 9 February 2015 the applications were com

Sursă