ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 18.10.2016 Auto

CASE OF ZAUSHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT

RUS

HOTĂRÂRE

18.10.2016

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF ZAUSHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2016)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul dl Zaushkin a fost reținut în arest fără ordin judiciar începând cu 5 noiembrie 2012, când ordinul de detenție din 17 mai a expirat și până la 19 noiembrie, când a fost eliberată o nouă ordine de detenție. În cazul dlui Kornev, în 25 aprilie 2013, instanța și-a ordonat transferul de la închisoarea de închidere sub arest la domiciliu, dar nu a fost transferat până la 16 mai. Reclamantul dl Butenko a rămas în custodie după ce instanța și-a ordonat eliberarea la 25 aprilie 2013 până când o instanță superioră a anulat ordonanța de eliberare la 11 iulie.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2013-03-25

ZHULIN v. RUSSIA

applicant’s pre-trial detention. The applicant was not heard. He appealed on the same day but the District Court sent the appeal to the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court only on 8 September 2005, that is, one month later. In his appeal he com

CtEDO 2016-01-07

KIRILLOV v. UKRAINE

to 12 August 2010, as during these periods there was no formal decision justifying his detention; and (b) from 12 August 2010 to 27 April 2012 when he was detained on the basis of a court order which did not cite any grounds for his detenti

CtEDO 2012-07-04

OREKHOVA v. RUSSIA

fully remained in the psychiatric hospital and that she had been unable either to appeal against the decision of 27 March 2006 or to challenge the grounds for her detention during the entire period. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Was the appli

CtEDO 2012-05-22

ZUYEV v. RUSSIA

a person in custody a court was to examine if there existed factual and legal grounds for applying the preventive measure. If the extradition request was accompanied by a detention order of a foreign court, a prosecutor was entitled to rema

CtEDO 2016-09-20

CASE OF MAKHMUD v. RUSSIA

the applicant’s detention. 15. On 26 July 2012 the applicant appealed. 16. On 13 September 2012 the St Petersburg City Court upheld the detention order on appeal. 17. On 12 September 2012, the District Court, relying on the same grounds, ex

Sursă