CtEDO 28.02.2017 Auto

CASE OF BIVOLARU v. ROMANIA

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
28.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF BIVOLARU v. ROMANIA (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil;Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea sau detenția legală;art. 5-1-c - Suspiciuni rezonabile);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea sau detenția legală);Nr o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedură penală;art. 6-2 - Presumarea nevinovăției);Nr o încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectarea vieții private);Dinune pecuniare - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-28
0,99
CASE OF BIVOLARU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2012-04-03
0,96
CASE OF RICCARDI v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness o
CtEDO 2017-02-28
0,96
AFFAIRE BIVOLARU c. ROUMANIE
Partiellement irrecevable;Non-violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulières;Article 5-1-c - Raisons plausibles de soupçonner);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et
CtEDO 2013-06-04
0,95
CASE OF STELIAN ROȘCA v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5
CtEDO 2014-11-13
0,94
CASE OF LAZARIU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-b - Lawful order of a court);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5
Sursă