CtEDO 13.02.2025 Auto

CASE OF DENYSYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
13.02.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case - {general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF DENYSYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul corespondenței);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul de corespondență;Respectul de viață privată);Încălcarea articoluluiui 38 - Examinarea cazului - {general} (art. 38 - Obligația de a furniza toate facilitățile necesare); prejudiciu moral - constatarea încălcării suficiente (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-02-13
0,99
CASE OF DENYSYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of Agent before the European Court of Human Right
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondenc
CtEDO 2025-03-13
0,97
CASE OF VYACHESLAVOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2021-07-22
0,96
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fa
CtEDO 2019-10-17
0,96
CASE OF POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rig
CtEDO 2021-07-22
0,96
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fa
Sursă