CtEDO 29.05.2018 Auto

CASE OF POCASOVSCHI AND MIHAILA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
29.05.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period (Russia);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim (the Republic of Moldova);Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (the Republic of Moldova);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (the Republic of Moldova)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF POCASOVSCHI AND MIHAILA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni (Rusia);Obiecția preliminară aderată la meritul și respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victime (Republica Moldova);Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Profundat în mod evident (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament inhuman) (Republica Moldova) (Aspectul substanţial) (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 13 - Tratament eficace) (art. 3 - Tratament eficace) (Republica Moldova);Nu are încălcarea articolului 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 3 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Republica Moldova); Nu are încălcarea articolului 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Prohibirea torturei; Obligaţii poziţionale) (Republica Moldova); Daune pespeci - atribuire nespeciului (ar (ar) (art. 41 - Lezive);

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-05-29
0,96
AFFAIRE POCASOVSCHI ET MIHAILA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET RUSSIE
Irrecevable (Article 35-1 - Délai de six mois) (Russie);Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Article 34 - Victime) (République de Moldova);Partiellement irrecevable (Article 35-3-a - Manifestement mal fondé) (République de Mold
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,95
CASE OF MARIYA ALEKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspec
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,95
POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,95
CASE OF POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
CtEDO 2019-08-27
0,94
CASE OF MAGNITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Ar
Sursă