CtEDO 17.07.2018 Auto

CASE OF MANGÎR AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
17.07.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention;Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) (Russia)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF MANGÎR AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Nu există încălcare a articolului 3 - Interdicție a torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Tratament degradant) (Tratament delictiv) (Republica Moldova);Violație a articolului 3 - Interdicție a torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect degradant) (Russia);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interdicție a torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect degradant) (Republica Moldova);Violație a articolului 3 - Interdicție a torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (Aspect substantiv) (Russia);Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul de libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - art. 5-3 - Resoluția legală de deținere a torturii anterioare;art. 5-4 - art. 13 - art. 13 - Retratamentultamentultalizare (art. 13 - Republica)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-07-02
0,97
CASE OF ANTONOV AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2019-09-17
0,96
CASE OF BERZAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2019-07-02
0,96
CASE OF BEȘLEAGĂ v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2016-02-23
0,96
Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC]
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione loci;Ratione personae) (Russia);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) (the Republic of Moldova);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article
CtEDO 2019-09-03
0,96
CASE OF DOBROVITSKAYA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia)
Sursă