CtEDO 31.10.2019 AI

CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
31.10.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respingă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea remediilor interne;(Art. 35-1) Remediu intern efectiv;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Lipsit evident de fundament;Încălcarea Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Trai degradant) (Aspect substanțial);Nicio încălcare a Articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Trai degradant) (Aspect substanțial);Daune morale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune morale;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,99
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibilit
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,98
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,97
Ulemek v. Croatia
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2016-10-20
0,95
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 -
CtEDO 2017-07-11
0,94
CASE OF ORAVEC v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 5
Sursă