CtEDO 31.10.2019 Auto

CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
31.10.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; (art. 35-1) Remediare internă eficientă; (Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect de susținere);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect de susținere); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,99
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibilit
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,99
Ulemek v. Croatia
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2019-10-31
0,98
CASE OF ULEMEK v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35
CtEDO 2016-10-20
0,96
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 -
CtEDO 2023-09-05
0,95
CASE OF HANŽEVAČKI v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibiti
Sursă