CtEDO 19.11.2019 Auto

CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS;UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
19.11.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Security of person) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Security of person) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent offence) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (Russia);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms) (Russia);Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-b - Adequate time) (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) (Russia);Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) (Russia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) (Russia);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Ukraine);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Prohibirea torturii (art. 3 - Investigare eficientă; Obligaţii pozitive) (aspect procedural) (Ucraina);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitate (art. 5-1 - Securitate a persoanei) (Ucraina);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Prohibirea torturii (art. 3 - Inspecţie eficientă; Obligaţii poziţionale) (aspect procedural) (Russia);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitatea (art. 5-1 - Securitate a persoanei) (Russia);Nu are încălcarea articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate şi securitatea (art. 5-1 - Încălcarea sau detenţie legală;art. 5-1 -Alin. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracţie paşnică a bunurilor (Russia); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie) (Ucraina); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie) (Russia)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-11-19
0,99
Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and s
CtEDO 2019-11-19
0,99
CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Ukraine);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and s
CtEDO 2024-06-25
0,96
CASE OF UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2024-06-25
0,95
Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) [GC]
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2024-04-04
0,95
CASE OF LOBKOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and s
Sursă