CtEDO 01.06.2021 Auto

CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
01.06.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Positive obligations);Violation of Article 14+11 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; (Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+8 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private;art. 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și familiale; Obligații posibile);Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+11 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 11 - Libertatea de asamblare și a asociere;art. 11-1 - Libertatea adunării pacifice); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Drumuri doar satisfactorii)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,98
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,98
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,98
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,98
Association ACCEPT and Others v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,96
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
Sursă