CtEDO
03.10.2017
AI
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
03.10.2017
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF ALEXANDRU ENACHE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
Obiecție preliminarăs respinge (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de recurs interne;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (articolul 3 - Tratament degradant) (Substanțial aspect);Fără încălcarea articolului 14+8 - Interzicerea discriminării (articolul 14 - Discriminare) (articolul 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;articolul 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Prejudiciu patrimonial - claim respinge (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial;Satisfacție echitabilă);Prejudiciu moral - acordare (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Satisfacție echitabilă)
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze