CtEDO 16.11.2021 Auto

CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
16.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Legislative amendments);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Obiecția preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-2-b) Chestiune deja examinată de Curtea;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private); Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46-2 - Amendamente legislative); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,98
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,98
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,98
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,96
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2021-02-09
0,95
CASE OF N.Ç. v. TURKEY - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Ar
Sursă