CtEDO 12.01.2023 Auto

CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
12.01.2023
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2023
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (CtEDO, 2023)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și a familiei (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Distrugerea pecuniară - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu moral - constatarea unei încălcări suficiente (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-01-12
0,99
CASE OF OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2023-01-12
0,99
Ovcharenko and Kolos v. Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,96
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2025-07-17
0,96
CASE OF OPALENKO v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Ar
CtEDO 2025-01-23
0,96
CASE OF REZNIK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for privat
Sursă