CtEDO 25.06.2019 AI

CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
25.06.2019
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania (CtEDO, 2019)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară înscrisă la fond și respingă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor de atac interne;Partea rămasă inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Nicio violare a Articolului 2 - Dreptul la viață (Articolul 2-1 - Investigație efectivă) (Aspectul procedural);Nicio violare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Accesul la instanță);Nicio violare a Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;Articolul 6-1 - Termen rezonabil)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,99
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,99
CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,99
Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC]
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,96
AFFAIRE NICOLAE VIRGILIU TĂNASE c. ROUMANIE
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;
CtEDO 2020-05-05
0,95
CASE OF KÖVESI v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Preliminary objection partially dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);Preliminary objection
Sursă