CtEDO 16.09.2025 RO

Yevropeyskyi sud pryiniav vid ukrayinskoho Verkhovnoho Sudu zapyt pro konsultatyvnyi vysnovok schodo togo chy mozhe vvazhatysia keliya monakhyni yiyi zhytlom

HOTĂRÂRE

16.09.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Yevropeyskyi sud pryiniav vid ukrayinskoho Verkhovnoho Sudu zapyt pro konsultatyvnyi vysnovok schodo togo chy mozhe vvazhatysia keliya monakhyni yiyi zhytlom (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2025-09-30

0,89

KURTCU c. TÜRKİYE

n o 35861/11, §§ 41-44, 17 novembre 2020, Tarariyeva, précité, §§ 74-75, Gagiu c. Roumanie, n o 63258/00, § 68, 24 février 2009, Kats et autres c. Ukraine, n o 29971/04, §§ 116 et 120, 18 décembre 2008, Mastromatteo c. Italie [GC], n o 3770

CtEDO 2025-06-27

0,88

MITOV c. BULGARIE

GC], n os 29381/09 et 32684/09, §§ 70, 72, 76-77, 84 et 91-92, CEDH 2013 (extraits), Fedotova et autres c. Russie [GC], n os 40792/10 et 2 autres, §§ 152-190, 17 janvier 2023, Güzel Erdagöz c. Turquie, n o 37483/02, §§ 44-50, 21 octobre 200

CtEDO 2025-09-03

0,88

CASE OF KRAYEVA AGAINST UKRAINE

Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)222 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Krayeva against Ukraine (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 September 2025 at the 1535 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application N

CtEDO 2025-10-13

0,88

PROSYANIK v. UKRAINE

(i) in particular, did the domestic courts provide sufficient reasons for their decisions and were their decisions “arbitrary” and/or “manifestly unreasonable” (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 61 ‐ 64, ECHR 2015; and Ra

CtEDO 2025-11-07

0,88

CASE OF ZAKARPATTYA REGIONAL UNION OF CONSUMER COOPERATIVES AND OTHERS AGAINST UKRAINE

awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)1041 ); Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to a similar violation, established on account of the denial of access to a court as a result of the Supreme Court’s

Sursă