SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications

Publicat pe 24 iulie 2023

SECȚIUNEA A CINCEA

Cererea nr. 15326/19 Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK împotriva Rusiei și alte 24 de cereri (vezi lista anexată)

INFORMAȚII PROCEDURALE

După examinarea preliminară a admisibilității cererilor pe 29 iunie 2023, Curtea a hotărât, în baza Regulii 54 § 2 (b) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții, că trebuie să se notifice Guvernului Rusiei despre cereri. În cererile marcate cu asteriscul, au fost ridicate și alte plângeri. Această parte a cererilor a fost eliminată din lista de cauze a Curții sau declarată inadmisibilă de Curtea care a funcționat ca judecător unic, cu asistența unui raportor, așa cum este prevăzut în Articolul 24 § 2 din Convenție. În lista cererilor anexate, ori de câte ori un reclamant este menționat prin inițiale, aceasta indică faptul că Curtea a autorizat anonimatul pentru acea persoană, a cărei identitate nu va fi dezvăluită publicului (Regula 47 § 4). Pentru informații suplimentare privind procedura după comunicarea unei cereri împotriva Rusiei, care fac obiectul jurisprudenței bine stabilite a Curții, vă rog să consultați site-ul Curții.

DOMENIU DE APLICARE

Cererile privesc plângeri ridicate în temeiul Articolului 11 din Convenție în legătură cu măsuri disproporționate împotriva organizatorilor și participanților la adunări publice care sunt obiectul jurisprudenței bine stabilite a Curții (vezi Frumkin c. Rusia, nr. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (fragmente), Navalnyy și Yashin c. Rusia, nr. 76204/11, 4 decembrie 2014 și Kasparov și alții c. Rusia, nr. 21613/07, 3 octombrie 2013).

ANEXĂ – EXPUNEREA FAPTELOR

Lista cererilor care ridică plângeri în temeiul Articolului 11 din Convenție (măsuri disproporționate împotriva organizatorilor și participanților la adunări publice)

Published on 24 July 2023

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 15326/19 Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK against Russia and 24 other applications (see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Name of the public event Location Date Administrative charges Penalty Final domestic decision Court Name Date Other complaints under well-established case-law 15326/19 11/03/2019 Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK 1990 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia Political rally Irkutsk 04/05/2018 Rally in support of Navalnyy Irkutsk 10/10/2020 Article 20.2 § 6 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 11,000 Irkutsk Regional Court 28/11/2018 Irkutsk Regional Court 03/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Irkutsk Regional Court, 28/11/2018 and 03/03/2021 20684/19* 02/04/2019 Aleksey Aleksandrovich LAVRINENKOV 1982 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally against the pension reform Smolensk 01/07/2018 Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Smolensk Regional Court 03/10/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Smolensk Regional Court,

03/10/2018 and 10/10/2018 Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction for calling on the public to participate in a rally against the pension reform on 09/09/2018, administrative offence under art. 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 1 day. Final decision: Smolensk Regional Court, 10/10/2018 28028/19* 14/05/2019 Nataliya Mikhaylovna SAVOSKINA 1980 Roman Denisovich Kiselyov Moscow Rally in support of Mr O. Sentsov Moscow 18/06/2018 Rally in support to Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 14/11/2018 Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 05.00 to 07.20 p.m.

on 18/06/2018, - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 02.20 to 07.50 p.m.

on 31/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Moscow City Court, 14/11/2018 and 11/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction (in respect of the set of proceedings which ended up with a decision of 11/05/2021) 28491/19* 16/05/2019 Olga Igorevna KUZNETSOVA 1962 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius “Hybrid” rally against the pension reform Arkhangelsk 09/09/2018 Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Arkhangelsk 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO two fines of RUB 14,000 and 15,000, respectively two fines of RUB 25,000 and 15,000, respectively Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018 and 29/01/2019 Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 12/03/2021 and 03/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 02.30 p.m.

on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case, - unrecorded escorting to a police station on 21/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018, 29/01/2019, 12/03/2021 and 03/06/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction (in respect of all sets of proceedings) 30007/19* 18/05/2019 Dmitriy Germanovich GUSEV 1976 Anton Sergeyevich Grachev Gatchina Rally in support of the persons prosecuted in "Novoye Velichiye" and "Set" criminal cases St Petersburg 28/10/2018 Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 St Petersburg City Court 13/12/2018 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 02.40 p.m.

on 28/10/2018 to 29/10/2018, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case, - from 09.13 p.m. on 06/08/2019 to 07.00 p.m. on 08/08/2019, the hearings in the applicants administrative-offence case, - unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - on 03/08/2019 the applicant pronounced a speech during an authorised public rally for fair elections in St Petersburg.

On 06/08/2019 he was arrested and escorted to a police station where he was charged with an administrative offence under Art. 20.1 § 1 CAO for having used a swearword in his speech in respect of Mr Putin. He was further convicted to an administrative detention of 10 days. Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 14/08/2019 Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 8 days for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised public event scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy.

Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 04/03/2021 37292/19* 24/06/2019 Yegor Mikhaylovich KARASEV 1998 Dmitriy Igorevich Zakhvatov Moscow Rally against isolation of Russian Internet Moscow 10/03/2019 Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 02/02/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 18/04/2019 Moscow City Court 03/06/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 12.30 a.m. to 06.00 p.m. on 10/03/2019, - from 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 08.30 a.m.

on 03/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/04/2019 and 03/06/2021 39338/19* 12/07/2019 Ilya Vladimirovich KOROBKOV 1986 Rally against the pension reform Yekaterinburg 09/09/2018 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Sverdlovsk Regional Court 16/01/2019 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.20 p.m.

on 09/09/2018 to 10/09/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 16/01/2019 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 42030/19* 19/07/2019 Boris Vadimovich FEDYUKIN 1989 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius Rally against the pension reform Samara 09/09/2018 March in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Samara 21/04/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 10,000 Samara Regional Court 31/01/2019 Samara Regional Court 20/07/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 08/11/2018 and on 26/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Samara Regional Court,

31/01/2019 and 20/07/2021 42221/19* 16/07/2019 Viktor Romanovich KAZANTSEV 2000 Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin Krasnoyarsk Rally against Mr Putin’s re ‑ election as President Krasnoyarsk 05/05/2018 Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Krasnoyarsk 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 20,000 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 17/01/2019 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 20/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 09.00 p.m.

on 05/05/2018, while the said record was drawn up only on 15/05/2018, - unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021, - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.20 to 10.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 12/02/2021 Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, fine of RUB 20,000 for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy.

Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (in respect of the proceedings related to calls and those related to the rally on 31/01/2021) – final decisions: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021 and 20/04/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction (in respect of the proceedings which ended with the final decision of 20/04/2021) 42683/19* 08/08/2019 Dmitriy Gennadyevich GUDKOV 1980 Yuliya Fedotova Yekaterinburg Rally in support of fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 14/07/2019 Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO administrative detention of 30 days fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 01/08/2019 Moscow City Court 29/09/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, - from 02.55 to 05.55 p.m.

on 27/07/2019, - from 03.30 p.m. on 28/07/2019 to 05.13 p.m. on 30/07/2019, hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 01/08/2019, 04/10/2019 and 29/09/2021 Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 10 days, for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 27/07/2019 for fair elections to Mosgorduma.

Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/10/2019 10059/21* 16/02/2021 Maksim Ruslanovich KONYUKHOV 1990 Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko Mytishchi Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO administrative detention of 15 days (partly exempted for health reasons on appeal by the Moscow City Court) Moscow City Court 05/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2020, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court,

05/02/2021 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 16344/21 08/03/2021 Nikita Alekseyevich DOBRYNIN 1993 Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh Moscow Political rally Moscow 24/03/2020 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 10/09/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 05.30 to 07.20 p.m.

on 24/03/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/09/2020 Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 24360/21 17/04/2021 Yevgeniya Vladimirovna VAZHENINA 1987 Vitaliy Viktorovich Cherkasov St Petersburg Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk Region Mr S. Furgal Khabarovsk 07/11/2020 Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal Khabarovsk 26/12/2020 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO administrative detention of 9 days fine of RUB 150,000 Khabarovsk Regional Court 18/11/2020 Khabarovsk Regional Court 30/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”: - from 02.00 p.m.

on 7/11/2020 to 10.00 a.m. on 09/11/2020, - from 01.00 p.m. on 15/02/2021 to 16/02/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (proceedings in 2020) 25053/21* 20/04/2021 Aleksandr Vasilyevich VASILYEV 1979 Konstantin Vladimirovich Bubon Khabarovsk Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal Khabarovsk 10/10/2020 Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO administrative detention of 20 days Khabarovsk Regional Court 20/10/2020 Prot.

7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 26915/21 08/05/2021 Mikhail Yevgenyevich PARFENYUK 1996 Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets Tbilisi, Georgia Political rally Irkutsk 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative detention of 10 days Irkutsk Regional Court 28/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 28225/21* 30/04/2021 Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna KLEPIKOVA 2000 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 13,000 Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 11.30 p.m.

on 23/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 28370/21 04/05/2021 Lada Sergeyevna SOKOLOVA 2021 Political rally Moscow 29/05/2020 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 06/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention there from 04.35 to 07.20 p.m.

on 29/05/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 28581/21* 02/06/2021 Syldys Aleksandrovich KHOMUSHKU 1984 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 22/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.30 to 11.50 p.m.

on 31/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 31621/21 07/06/2021 Yaroslav Ruslanovich MAYKOV 1990 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 18/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.45 a.m. to 09.30 p.m.

on 31/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution 31684/21* 07/06/2021 Nikolay Sergeyevich AGAPOV 1993 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 23/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 20/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 08.25 p.m.

on 23/01/2021 to 02.40 a.m. on 24/01/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 32175/21* 11/06/2021 Dmitriy Andreyevich PEREGON 1999 Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Vladivostok 31/01/2021 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Primorye Regional Court 13/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 03.50 p.m.

on 31/01/2021 to 04.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021; the applicant spent more than 4 hours in the police van Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction 32607/21 29/05/2021 Yelena Sergeyvna BEREZHNAYA 1992 Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh Moscow Environmental rally (march) Moscow 16/08/2020 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 15,000 Moscow City Court 30/11/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 06.00 to 09.25 p.m.

on 16/08/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction 32652/21 29/05/2021 Diana Yevgenyevna BORISEVICH 1997 Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh Moscow Environmental rally (march) Moscow 16/08/2020 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 04/12/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 06.25 to 09.05 p.m.

on 16/08/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction 32654/21 29/05/2021 Aliya Makhmutovna GIZETDINOVA 1992 Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh Moscow Environmental rally (march) Moscow 16/08/2020 Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Moscow City Court 04/12/2020 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 to 9.25 p.m.

on 16/08/2020 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution 52100/21* 12/10/2021 Boris Leonidovich KROTOV 1971 Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova Moscow Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy Moscow 02/02/2021 Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO fine of RUB 20,000 Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m.

on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings