SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Communicated
SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications (CtEDO, 2023)SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications (CtEDO, 2023) SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications App no echr_001-226112 (CtEDO, 29 Iunie 2023) @case{17615, title = {SARANCHUK v. RUSSIA and 24 other applications}, court = {CtEDO}, number = {echr_001-226112}, year = 2023 }
Publicat pe 24 iulie 2023
SECȚIUNEA A CINCEA
Cererea nr. 15326/19
Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK împotriva Rusiei
și alte 24 de cereri
(vezi lista anexată)
INFORMAȚII PROCEDURALE
După examinarea preliminară a admisibilității cererilor pe 29 iunie 2023, Curtea a hotărât, în baza Regulii 54 § 2 (b) din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții, că trebuie să se notifice Guvernului Rusiei despre cereri.
În cererile marcate cu asteriscul, au fost ridicate și alte plângeri. Această parte a cererilor a fost eliminată din lista de cauze a Curții sau declarată inadmisibilă de Curtea care a funcționat ca judecător unic, cu asistența unui raportor, așa cum este prevăzut în Articolul 24 § 2 din Convenție.
În lista cererilor anexate, ori de câte ori un reclamant este menționat prin inițiale, aceasta indică faptul că Curtea a autorizat anonimatul pentru acea persoană, a cărei identitate nu va fi dezvăluită publicului (Regula 47 § 4).
Pentru informații suplimentare privind procedura după comunicarea unei cereri împotriva Rusiei, care fac obiectul jurisprudenței bine stabilite a Curții, vă rog să consultați site-ul Curții.
DOMENIU DE APLICARE
Cererile privesc plângeri ridicate în temeiul Articolului 11 din Convenție în legătură cu măsuri disproporționate împotriva organizatorilor și participanților la adunări publice care sunt obiectul jurisprudenței bine stabilite a Curții (vezi Frumkin c. Rusia, nr. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (fragmente), Navalnyy și Yashin c. Rusia, nr. 76204/11, 4 decembrie 2014 și Kasparov și alții c. Rusia, nr. 21613/07, 3 octombrie 2013).
ANEXĂ – EXPUNEREA FAPTELOR
Lista cererilor care ridică plângeri în temeiul Articolului 11 din Convenție
(măsuri disproporționate împotriva organizatorilor și participanților la adunări publice)
Published on 24 July 2023
FIFTH SECTION
Application no.
15326/19
Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK against Russia
and 24 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 29 June 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s
website
.
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see
Frumkin v. Russia,
no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts),
Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia,
no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and
Kasparov and Others v. Russia,
no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
15326/19
11/03/2019
Irina Vladimirovna SARANCHUK
1990
Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets
Tbilisi, Georgia
Political rally
Irkutsk
04/05/2018
Rally in support of Navalnyy
Irkutsk
10/10/2020
Article 20.2 § 6 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
fine of RUB
11,000
Irkutsk Regional Court
28/11/2018
Irkutsk Regional Court
03/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Irkutsk Regional Court, 28/11/2018 and 03/03/2021
20684/19*
02/04/2019
Aleksey Aleksandrovich LAVRINENKOV
1982
Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov
Novocheboksarsk
Rally against the pension reform
Smolensk
01/07/2018
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
Smolensk Regional Court
03/10/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Smolensk Regional Court, 03/10/2018 and 10/10/2018
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction for calling on the public to participate in a rally against the pension reform on 09/09/2018, administrative offence under art. 20.2 § 8 of the CAO, administrative detention of 1
day. Final decision: Smolensk Regional Court, 10/10/2018
28028/19*
14/05/2019
Nataliya Mikhaylovna SAVOSKINA
1980
Roman Denisovich Kiselyov
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
O.
Sentsov
Moscow
18/06/2018
Rally in support to Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
14/11/2018
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty:
- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, from 05.00 to 07.20 p.m. on 18/06/2018,
- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and detention in excess of 3
hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 02.20 to 07.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Moscow City Court, 14/11/2018 and 11/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction
(in respect of the set of proceedings which ended up with a decision of 11/05/2021)
28491/19*
16/05/2019
Olga Igorevna KUZNETSOVA
1962
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
“Hybrid” rally against the pension reform
Arkhangelsk
09/09/2018
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Arkhangelsk
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
two fines of RUB 14,000 and 15,000, respectively
two fines of RUB 25,000 and 15,000, respectively
Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018 and
29/01/2019
Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 12/03/2021 and
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
- from 02.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case,
- unrecorded escorting to a police station on 21/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 20/11/2018, 29/01/2019, 12/03/2021 and 03/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction (in respect of all sets of proceedings)
30007/19*
18/05/2019
Dmitriy Germanovich GUSEV
1976
Anton Sergeyevich Grachev
Gatchina
Rally in support of the persons prosecuted in "Novoye Velichiye" and "Set" criminal cases
St Petersburg
28/10/2018
Article 20.2.2 §
1 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
- from 02.40
p.m. on 28/10/2018 to 29/10/2018, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
- from 09.13 p.m. on 06/08/2019 to 07.00
p.m. on 08/08/2019, the hearings in the applicants administrative-offence case,
- unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - on 03/08/2019 the applicant pronounced a speech during an authorised public rally for fair elections in St Petersburg. On 06/08/2019 he was arrested and escorted to a police station where he was charged with an administrative offence under Art. 20.1 § 1 CAO for having used a swearword in his speech in respect of Mr Putin. He was further convicted to an administrative detention of 10 days. Final decision: St
Petersburg City Court, 14/08/2019
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 8 days for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised public event scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy. Final decision: St
Petersburg City Court, 04/03/2021
37292/19*
24/06/2019
Yegor Mikhaylovich KARASEV
1998
Dmitriy Igorevich Zakhvatov
Moscow
Rally against isolation of Russian Internet
Moscow
10/03/2019
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
fine of RUB
15,000
Moscow City Court
18/04/2019
Moscow City Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
- from 12.30 a.m. to 06.00 p.m. on 10/03/2019,
- from 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 08.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 18/04/2019 and 03/06/2021
39338/19*
12/07/2019
Ilya Vladimirovich KOROBKOV
1986
Rally against the pension reform
Yekaterinburg
09/09/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
16/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.20
p.m. on 09/09/2018 to 10/09/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court, 16/01/2019
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
42030/19*
19/07/2019
Boris Vadimovich FEDYUKIN
1989
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally against the pension reform
Samara
09/09/2018
March in support of Mr
A. Navalnyy
Samara
21/04/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
fine of RUB
10,000
Samara Regional Court
31/01/2019
Samara Regional Court
20/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, on 08/11/2018 and on 26/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Samara Regional Court, 31/01/2019 and 20/07/2021
42221/19*
16/07/2019
Viktor Romanovich KAZANTSEV
2000
Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin
Krasnoyarsk
Rally against Mr
Putin’s re
‑
election as President
Krasnoyarsk
05/05/2018
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
fine of RUB
20,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
17/01/2019
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty:
- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 09.00 p.m. on 05/05/2018, while the said record was drawn up only on 15/05/2018,
- unlawful escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,
- escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 01.20 to 10.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 12/02/2021
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, fine of RUB 20,000 for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 23/01/2021 in support of Mr A. Navalnyy. Final decision: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (in respect of the proceedings related to calls and those related to the rally on 31/01/2021) – final decisions: Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 11/03/2021 and 20/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
(in respect of the proceedings which ended with the final decision of 20/04/2021)
42683/19*
08/08/2019
Dmitriy Gennadyevich GUDKOV
1980
Yuliya Fedotova
Yekaterinburg
Rally in support of fair elections to Mosgorduma
Moscow
14/07/2019
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative detention of 30
days
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
01/08/2019
Moscow City Court
29/09/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”,
- from 02.55 to 05.55 p.m. on 27/07/2019,
- from 03.30 p.m. on 28/07/2019 to 05.13 p.m. on 30/07/2019, hearings in the applicant’s administrative-offence case
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions: Moscow City Court, 01/08/2019, 04/10/2019 and 29/09/2021
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - conviction under art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 10 days, for an administrative offence of calling on the public to participate in an unauthorised rally scheduled for 27/07/2019 for fair elections to Mosgorduma. Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/10/2019
10059/21*
16/02/2021
Maksim Ruslanovich KONYUKHOV
1990
Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko
Mytishchi
Rally in support of Mr A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 15
days (partly exempted for health reasons on appeal by the Moscow City Court)
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2020, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
16344/21
08/03/2021
Nikita Alekseyevich DOBRYNIN
1993
Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh
Moscow
Political rally
Moscow
24/03/2020
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
10/09/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 05.30 to 07.20
p.m. on 24/03/2020
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings– final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/09/2020
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
24360/21
17/04/2021
Yevgeniya Vladimirovna VAZHENINA
1987
Vitaliy Viktorovich Cherkasov
St Petersburg
Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk Region Mr
S.
Furgal
Khabarovsk
07/11/2020
Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal
Khabarovsk
26/12/2020
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
administrative detention of 9
days
fine of RUB
150,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
18/11/2020
Khabarovsk Regional Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
- from 02.00 p.m. on 7/11/2020 to 10.00
a.m. on 09/11/2020,
- from 01.00 p.m. on 15/02/2021 to 16/02/2021, the hearings in the applicant’s administrative offence case
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (proceedings in 2020)
25053/21*
20/04/2021
Aleksandr Vasilyevich VASILYEV
1979
Konstantin Vladimirovich Bubon
Khabarovsk
Rally in support of the governor of the Khabarovsk region Mr S. Furgal
Khabarovsk
10/10/2020
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
administrative detention of 20
days
Khabarovsk Regional Court
20/10/2020
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
26915/21
08/05/2021
Mikhail Yevgenyevich PARFENYUK
1996
Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Ivanets
Tbilisi, Georgia
Political rally
Irkutsk
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 10
days
Irkutsk Regional Court
28/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
28225/21*
30/04/2021
Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna KLEPIKOVA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
13,000
Moscow City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 04.00 to 11.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
28370/21
04/05/2021
Lada Sergeyevna SOKOLOVA
2021
Political rally
Moscow
29/05/2020
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
Moscow City Court
06/11/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention there from 04.35 to 07.20
p.m. on 29/05/2020
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
28581/21*
02/06/2021
Syldys Aleksandrovich KHOMUSHKU
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 05.30 to 11.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
31621/21
07/06/2021
Yaroslav Ruslanovich MAYKOV
1990
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.45
a.m. to 09.30
p.m. on 31/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution
31684/21*
07/06/2021
Nikolay Sergeyevich AGAPOV
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
Moscow City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 08.25 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 02.40 a.m. on 24/01/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
32175/21*
11/06/2021
Dmitriy Andreyevich PEREGON
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
Primorye Regional Court
13/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 03.50
p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 04.15 a.m. on 01/02/2021; the applicant spent more than 4 hours in the police van
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for his conviction
32607/21
29/05/2021
Yelena Sergeyvna BEREZHNAYA
1992
Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh
Moscow
Environmental rally (march)
Moscow
16/08/2020
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
15,000
Moscow City Court
30/11/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 06.00 to 09.25 p.m. on 16/08/2020
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction
32652/21
29/05/2021
Diana Yevgenyevna BORISEVICH
1997
Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh
Moscow
Environmental rally (march)
Moscow
16/08/2020
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
04/12/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; from 06.25 to 09.05 p.m. on 16/08/2020
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction
32654/21
29/05/2021
Aliya Makhmutovna GIZETDINOVA
1992
Fedor Yevgenyevich Sirosh
Moscow
Environmental rally (march)
Moscow
16/08/2020
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB
10,000
Moscow City Court
04/12/2020
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 to 9.25 p.m. on 16/08/2020
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - domestic courts’ failure to call and examine the police officers whose written reports were used for her conviction; impossibility to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution
52100/21*
12/10/2021
Boris Leonidovich KROTOV
1971
Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr
A.
Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
Article 20.2 §
6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB
20,000
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings