ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 15.12.2005 Auto

CASE OF ZAUGOLNOVA v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
15.12.2005
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Art. 6-1 (non-enforcement of judgment);Violation of P1-1;Remainder inadmissible;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2005
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF ZAUGOLNOVA v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2005)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1946 și locuiește în Neryungri. La 10 aprilie 2002, Curtea de Oraș Nyururi a acordat acțiunii civile a reclamantului împotriva departamentului de poliție al orașului Neryungri și a acordat 16.683.23 ruble ruse („RUR”). La 5 iunie 2002, Curtea Supremă a Republicii Sakha (Yakutiya) a susținut hotărârea privind recursul. În aceeași zi judecata a devenit finală și executibilă. La 3 decembrie 2002, Curtea de Oraș Nyururi a emis o scrisoare de execuție. La 16 iulie 2003, reclamantul a depus scrisoarea execuției departamentului de poliție al orașului Neryungri. La 8 decembrie 2004, administrația orașului Neryungri a transferat RUR 16.683.23 la contul reclamantului.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2007-02-01
0,93
CASE OF ZAICHENKO v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1969 and lives in Voronezh. 5. She brought civil proceedings against her local authority requesting arrears of child benefits due to her. 6. On 15 December 2000 the Zheleznodorozhny District Court of Voronezh gr
CtEDO 2007-04-12
0,93
CASE OF NEOFITA v. RUSSIA
Russian roubles (RUR, approximately 2,110 euros) in compensation for a special-purpose settlement order by the terms of which the Government was to provide her with a car in exchange for payments extracted from the applicant's salary and be
CtEDO 2005-11-17
0,92
CASE OF TOLOKONNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Voronezh. 5. The applicant receives welfare payments for her child. In 2000 she brought civil proceedings against a local welfare authority, claiming arrears in those payments for 1998 – 1999.
CtEDO 2007-06-21
0,92
CASE OF KUDRINA v. RUSSIA
Russian roubles (RUR, approximately 4,243 euros) in compensation for a special-purpose settlement order by the terms of which the Government was to provide her with a car. 6. On 17 February 2003 the Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutiya) Rep
CtEDO 2007-02-01
0,92
CASE OF VORONINA v. RUSSIA
4. The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in Voronezh. 5. She brought civil proceedings against her local authority requesting arrears of child benefits due to her. 6. On 17 March 2000 the Levoberezhny District Court of Voronezh granted h
Sursă