ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.02.2010 Auto

CASE OF ATEȘSÖNMEZ v. TURKEY

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
16.02.2010
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Art. 6-1
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2010
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF ATEȘSÖNMEZ v. TURKEY (CtEDO, 2010)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1947 și locuiește în Istanbul. În urma privatizării institutului public în care a fost angajat ca inspector, la 19 martie 1999, reclamantul a fost desemnat la un nou post la Instituția de Securitate Socială pentru Auto-ocupat (BağKur). La 16 aprilie 1999, reclamantul a interzis Curtea Administrativă din Ankara împotriva Oficiului Primului Ministru și Bağ-Kur pentru a-și contesta numirea. La 2 decembrie 1999, instanța administrativă a respins cererea reclamantului, declarând că numirea sa a fost efectuată în conformitate cu legislația internă relevantă. La 14 octombrie 2003, Curtea Administrativă Supremă a susținut decizia instanței administrative și, la 1 februarie 2006, a respins cererea de rectificare a reclamantului.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-10-10
0,91
CASE OF BAĞLAR v. TURKEY
4. The applicant, who was born in 1989, lives in Istanbul. 5. On 14 January 2009 the applicant was taken into police custody on suspicion of membership of an illegal organisation. 6. On 17 January 2009 the investigating judge at the Istanbu
CtEDO 2007-03-06
0,91
CASE OF ERDOĞAN YAĞIZ v. TURKEY
had been handcuffed without being informed of the accusations against him and insulted in front of his family and police personnel, and of all the forms of humiliation he had suffered without knowing why. 22. The public prosecutor's office
CtEDO 2010-02-23
0,91
CASE OF EVCİMEN v. TURKEY
4. The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Istanbul. 5. In 1989 the applicant started working at a privately owned factory in the city of Ordu. On 4 February 1993 he had an accident in the factory and seriously injured his leg. Subseque
CtEDO 2009-09-29
0,90
CAYTAS v. TURKEY
The applicants are all Turkish nationals. Their names, dates of birth, the names of their representatives and the dates on which they lodged their applications appear in the appendix. The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants,
CtEDO 2009-09-22
0,90
CASE OF SİNGAR v. TURKEY
4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Ağrı. 5. On 28 January 1995 the applicant was arrested in Istanbul on suspicion of being a member of an illegal organisation. On 15 February 1995 he was remanded in custody. 6. On 24 April 1995
Sursă