ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 30.03.2010 Auto

CASE OF GYOZO NAGY v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT

HUN

HOTĂRÂRE

30.03.2010

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Violation of Art. 6-1

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2010
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

CASE OF GYOZO NAGY v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2010)

HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1942 și locuiește în Budapesta. La 12 noiembrie 1998, reclamantul a fost acuzat de fraudă și de falsificare a documentelor. La 28 aprilie 2000, Curtea de district Miskolc l-a considerat vinovat. Prin recurs, Curtea Regională a Județeanului Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén a anulat această decizie și a trimis cazul la instanța de primă instanță la 5 iunie 2001. În reluarea procedurii, Curtea de District a achitat reclamantul la 11 decembrie 2002. Această hotărâre a fost anulată de Curtea Regională la 3 iunie 2004. În reluarea procedurii, Curtea de District a declarat reclamantul vinovat la 13 iulie 2005. Prin recurs, Curtea Regională a anulat această hotărâre și, în cele din urmă, a achitat reclamantul la 16 martie 2006.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2015-10-01

CASE OF UDVARDY v. HUNGARY

4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Komló. 5. On 19 February 2003 the applicant was interrogated as suspect of forgery of private documents. 6. The Public Prosecutor preferred a bill of indictment on 8 October 2004. Subsequently,

CtEDO 2011-02-08

CASE OF GYULANE SZABO v. HUNGARY

4. The applicant was born in 1925 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 20 June 1996 the applicant brought an action against several private individuals before the Pest Central District Court, seeking the review of a resolution adopted by the commun

CtEDO 2014-10-21

CASE OF NAGY v. HUNGARY

SECOND SECTION CASE OF NAGY v. HUNGARY (Application no. 72262/12) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 October 2014 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Nagy v. Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Se

CtEDO 2011-03-15

CASE OF LASZLO MOLNAR v. HUNGARY

4. The applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 15 September 1989 the applicant brought an action against a private individual before the Pest Central District Court, seeking to recover the possession of some specific movable

CtEDO 2005-12-20

CASE OF NAGY v. HUNGARY

that on that occasion she had been ill-treated by the police officers and that the latter had not allowed the emergency medical staff, which had been called to her son on account of another asthma attack, to enter the house. On 12 March 200

Sursă