ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.02.2015 Auto

CASE OF JÁNOS DÁNIEL SZABÓ v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
17.02.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF JÁNOS DÁNIEL SZABÓ v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1980 și trăiește în Szigethalom. Între 13 decembrie 2004 și 4 aprilie 2012, procedurile penale au fost efectuate împotriva reclamantului în fața Curții de District Ráckeve, printre care un mandat ordonat de Curtea Regională a Județeanului Pest. Prima hotărâre dată de Curtea de District la 29 martie 2010 a conținut expirarea timpului ca factor minor de atenuare. Cu toate acestea, a doua hotărâre finală dată de Curtea Regională la 4 aprilie 2012 (care este, după repartizare) a fost o decizie simplificată care nu conține nicio considerație în ceea ce privește atenuarea.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2011-02-08
0,91
CASE OF GYULANE SZABO v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1925 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 20 June 1996 the applicant brought an action against several private individuals before the Pest Central District Court, seeking the review of a resolution adopted by the commun
CtEDO 2011-03-15
0,90
CASE OF LASZLO MOLNAR v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 15 September 1989 the applicant brought an action against a private individual before the Pest Central District Court, seeking to recover the possession of some specific movable
CtEDO 2011-12-20
0,90
CASE OF JANOS TOTH v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Budapest. 5. In or about November 1993 the applicant and his wife brought an action against several respondents before the Budapest XVIII/XIX District Court, seeking ownership of a real estate
CtEDO 2010-03-30
0,89
CASE OF GYOZO NAGY v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 12 November 1998 the applicant was charged with fraud and forging documents. On 28 April 2000 the Miskolc District Court found him guilty. On appeal, the Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Co
CtEDO 2011-01-11
0,89
CASE OF JANOS LAKATOS v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1931 and lives in Miske. 5. On 2 August 1992 two plaintiffs brought an action in trespass against the applicant before the Kalocsa District Court. After several hearings, a judgment was given on 8 September 1994
Sursă