AFFAIRE ALLEN CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 64 [1] Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Allen împotriva Regatului Unit Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că Convenția mai jos [2] Având în vedere hotărârea de mai jos, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului odată ce a devenit definitiv Numele cauzei (ref. in) Hotărârea Definitivului Allen (18837/06) 30/03/2010 30/06/2010 Reamintind că constatările de încălcare făcute de Curte impun, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate în hotărâri, adoptarea de către statul membru pârât, dacă este necesar, a unor măsuri individuale care să pună capăt încălcărilor și să șteargă, pe cât posibil, consecințele acestora pentru solicitant, precum și măsuri generale care să permită prevenirea unor încălcări similare; După ce a invitat autoritățile din statul membru în cauză să furnizeze un plan de acțiune privind măsurile propuse pentru executarea hotărârii; după ce a examinat, în conformitate cu normele Comitetului privind aplicarea articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție, bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern (a se vedea bilanțul de acțiune, documentul DH-DD(2012)59E [3] după ce a luat act de faptul că în statul pârât a plătit părții reclamante satisfacția echitabilă prevăzută în hotărârea; DECURSĂ că acesta și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d Case of Allen v The United Kingdom (Applicație nr. 18837/06; judgment final on 30 June 2010) Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 13 October 2011 Case Summary Case description: - The caseta se referă la o violare a aplicant's right to test the lawfulness of her detention before a scurt, due to the refuzal, in October 2005, of a request by her counsel for the applicant to be present at the hearing of an appeal filed by the prosecutor against a previous judicial decision granting her chaille. - The Court held that there had been a încălcarea articolului 5§4. Individual Measures Satisfacție echitabilă: - The just satisfaction award of €1,000 has been paid, as converted to poundsster; evidence previously submitted. Other individual measures: - The Government considers no further individual Measures are required as just satisfaction has been paid. The applicant is no longer held on remand. General Measures General Measures: The Government a taken the folowing general measures: - England and Wales An amendment has been made to Criminal Procedure Rule 19(17) which governs the right of the deflant to be present at the hearing of a prosecution appeal to the Crown Court against the grainst the graunt of contractation made in a magistrates request. The amendment comes into force on 4 October 2010. See paragraph 8 of the document of the document in this link http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/2010/pdf/uksi2010/uksi_20101921_en.pdf The amendment to the Rule has been diseminated to scurt staff in England and Wales through ghidance the amendment to the Rule has been diseminated to Crown Prosecutors in England and Wales through internal ghidance - Scotland The Scottish Government reports that the folowing measures have been taken: On 24 November 2010, the Lord Justice General pased an Act of Adjournal amending the Criminal Procedure Rules to grant the apted an expres right to așteptați Crown appeal hearings. The Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rule Amendment No. 4) (Miscellaneous) 2010 came into force on 13 decembrie 2010. The amendment to the Rules has been disseminated to scurt staff. - Northern Ireland In Northern Ireland, the current Practice is that founds are rutinely present (often by means of live video link) for the hearing of prosecution apneals against the grant of requelation in the High Court. Additionally, a ghidance document was issued in June 2010 to all judges with a criminal juridiction. That document contents a specialified note on the Implications of Allen v UK and a link to the fulltrant of the judgment. The judgment has also been distributed to prosecutors. Publication: - The judgment has been publicised in the following locations: The British and Irish Legal Information Institute Website at http://www.leaningii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/20.html The UK Human Rights Blog Website at http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2010/04/01/acuzat-should-have-been-allowed-to-appeal-against-the-grant-of-her-leange/Criminal Law and Justice Weekly Publication at http://www.criminalawandjustice.co.uk/index.php?/Analysis/appeals-from-grants-of-league.html Blackstones Criminal Practice Newsletter (at pagina 3 din document) http://www.oup.com/uk/booksites/content/9780199574247/jul10_bulletinDissemination: - The Government considers it is unnecessary to diseminate the judgment any further. - The Government considers that all necessary measures have been taken and that the case should be closed. [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 8 martie 2012 cu ocazia celei de-a 1136-a reuniuni a Delegaților miniștrilor. [2] a se vedea, de asemenea, recomandările adoptate de Comitetul de Miniștri în cadrul supravegherii hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului, în special Recomandarea Rec.,2004)6 a Comitetului de Miniștri al statelor membre privind îmbunătățirea căilor de atac interne. [3] Document numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)64

[1]

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

Allen contre le Royaume-Uni

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»)

[2]

,

Vu l’arrêt ci-dessous, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité une fois qu’il est devenu définitif

;

Nom de l’affaire (réf. requête)

Arrêt du

Définitif le

Allen (18837/06)

30/03/2010

30/06/2010

Rappelant que les constats de violation faits par la Cour exigent, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée dans les arrêts, l’adoption par l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire, de mesures individuelles mettant fin aux violations et effaçant autant que possible les conséquences de celles-ci pour le requérant, et de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité les autorités de l’Etat défendeur à fournir un plan d’action concernant les mesures proposées pour exécuter l’arrêt;

Ayant examiné, conformément aux Règles du Comité pour l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe

2, de la Convention, le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement (voir le bilan d’action, document

DH-DD(2012)59E

)

[3]

;

Ayant noté que

l’Etat défendeur a versé à la partie requérante la satisfaction équitable prévue dans l’arrêt ;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Action Plan/Action Report and Updates Template

Case of Allen v The United Kingdom (Application no. 18837/06; judgment final on 30 June 2010) Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 13 October 2011

Case Summary

1.

Case description:

- The case concerned a violation of the applicant's right to test the lawfulness of her detention before a court, due to the refusal, in October 2005, of a request by her counsel for the applicant to be present at the hearing of an appeal filed by the prosecutor against a previous judicial decision granting her bail.

- The Court held that there had been a violation of Article 5§4.

Individual Measures

2.

Just satisfaction:

- The just satisfaction award of €1,000 has been paid, as converted to pounds sterling; evidence previously submitted.

3.

Other individual measures:

- The Government considers no further individual measures are required as just satisfaction has been paid. The applicant is no longer held on remand.

General Measures

4.

General measures:

- The Government has taken the following general measures:

- England and Wales

An amendment has been made to Criminal Procedure Rule 19(17) which governs the right of the defendant to be present at the hearing of a prosecution appeal to the Crown Court against the grant of bail made in a magistrates’ court. The amendment comes into force on 4 October 2010. See paragraph 8 of the document in this link

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2010/pdf/uksi_20101921_en.pdf

The amendment to the Rule has been disseminated to court staff in England and Wales through internal guidance

The amendment to the Rule has been disseminated to Crown Prosecutors in England and Wales through internal guidance

- Scotland

The Scottish Government reports that the following measures have been taken:

On 24 November 2010, the Lord Justice General passed an Act of Adjournal amending the Criminal Procedure Rules to grant the accused an express right to attend Crown bail appeal hearings. The Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules Amendment No. 4) (Miscellaneous) 2010 came into force on 13 December 2010.

The amendment to the Rules has been disseminated to court staff.

- Northern Ireland

In Northern Ireland, the current practice is that defendants are routinely present (often by means of live video link) for the hearing of prosecution appeals against the grant of bail in the High Court. Additionally, a guidance document was issued in June 2010 to all judges with a criminal jurisdiction. That document contains a specific note on the implications of Allen v UK and a link to the full transcript of the judgment. The judgment has also been distributed to prosecutors.

5.

Publication:

- The judgment has been publicised in the following locations:

The British and Irish Legal Information Institute website at

http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/420.html

The UK Human Rights Blog website at

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2010/04/01/accused-should-have-been-allowed-to-attend-appeal-against-the-grant-of-her-bail/

Criminal Law and Justice Weekly publication at

http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/index.php?/Analysis/appeals-from-grants-of-bail.html

Blackstone’s Criminal Practice Bulletin (at page 3 of the document) at

http://www.oup.com/uk/booksites/content/9780199574247/jul10_bulletin

6.

Dissemination:

- The Government considers it is unnecessary to disseminate the judgment any further.

7.

- The Government considers that all necessary measures have been taken and that the case should be closed.

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 8 mars 2012 lors de la 1136e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

voir aussi les recommandations adoptées par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la supervision des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, et en particulier la Recommandation

Rec(2004)6 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats membres sur l'amélioration des recours internes.

[3]

Document en anglais uniquement