Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 14 [1] Execuția hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Orlić împotriva Croației Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumită în continuare "deciziile Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului"). Convenția mai jos [2] Având în vedere hotărârea de mai jos, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului odată ce a devenit definitiv Numele cauzei (ref. in) Hotărârea Definitivului Orl Reamintind că constatările de încălcare făcute de Curte impun, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate în hotărâri, adoptarea de către statul membru pârât, dacă este necesar, a unor măsuri individuale care să pună capăt încălcărilor și să șteargă, pe cât posibil, consecințele acestora pentru solicitant, precum și măsuri generale care să permită prevenirea unor încălcări similare; După ce a invitat autoritățile din statul pârât să furnizeze un plan de acțiune privind măsurile propuse pentru executarea hotărârii; după ce a examinat, în conformitate cu normele Comitetului privind aplicarea articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție, bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern (a se vedea bilanțul de acțiune, documentul DH-DD(2012)72 [3] După ce a luat act de faptul că Statul pârât a plătit părții reclamante satisfacția echitabilă prevăzută în hotărârea pronunțată; DECURSĂ că acesta și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție în această cauză și DECIDE DECIDE DELÂNGE LA . ACȚIUNEA REPORT ORLIC V. CORATIA APLICARE NO.:48833/07 JUDGMENT OF 21/06/2011 FINAL ON: 21/09/2011 In its judgment in the 0rlić case the ECTHR found a violation of Article 8 due to the object of domestical scurts to apply the proportionality test in the eviction proceedings brought against the applicant who, under domestic law, was not legally entitled to ocupa the flat he lived in. Thefacts of this case and the findings of the ECIHR are identital to those in the cases of Under Article 428a of the Croațian Code of Civil Procedure, following the final judgment of the Court, the applicant had the right to file a micion for the reopening of die procesion. The deadline for filing such a micion expired on October 21 2011. Applicant did not file a micion for reopening of procesings. Therefore, no individual measures are necessary nor posibil. GENERAL MEASSURS The Judgment has been translated into Croațian language and diseminated to all aparținând autorităților publice ale RoC, the Suprem Court of RoC, the County Court in Rijeka, the Municipal Court in Rijeka, Attorney General Electroluxs Office and the Ministry of Justice. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia on decembrie 22 2010 (Decizia nr. III-46/2007) enhanced its Practice regarding the right to respect of one Since thefacts of this case are identificcal to those of Satisfacție echitabilă awarded to the aplicant has been paid on November 28. 2011, and payment information on a precribed form delivered to the Execution mais department on November 5, 2011. CONCLUZIE The Government deems that all necessary measures for the execution of the judgment in this case have been taken, and prin urmare propus to the Committee of Ministers the close of the execution supervision proces. [art. 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția în raport cu Rule 17 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements] [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 8 martie 2012 în cadrul celei de a 1136-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] a se vedea, de asemenea, recomandările adoptate de Comitetul de Miniștri în cadrul supravegherii hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului, în special Recomandarea Rec.,2004)6 a Comitetului de Miniștri al statelor membre privind îmbunătățirea căilor de atac interne. [3] Document numai în limba engleză
Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)14
[1]
Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
Orlić contre Croatie
Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «
la Convention
» et «
la Cour
»)
[2]
,
Vu l’arrêt ci-dessous, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité une fois qu’il est devenu définitif
;
Nom de l’affaire (réf. requête)
Arrêt du
Définitif le
Orlić (48833/07)
21/06/2011
21/09/2011
Rappelant que les constats de violation faits par la Cour exigent, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée dans les arrêts, l’adoption par l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire, de mesures individuelles mettant fin aux violations et effaçant autant que possible les conséquences de celles-ci pour le requérant, et de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;
Ayant invité les autorités de l’Etat défendeur à fournir un plan d’action concernant les mesures proposées pour exécuter l’arrêt ;
Ayant examiné, conformément aux Règles du Comité pour l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe
2, de la Convention, le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement (voir bilan d’action, document
[3]
)
;
Ayant noté que
l’Etat défendeur a versé à la partie requérante la satisfaction équitable prévue dans l’arrêt ;
DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et
DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.
In its judgment in the 0rlić case the ECtHR found a violation of Article 8 due to the omission of domestic courts to apply the proportionality test in the eviction proceedings brought against the applicant who, under domestic law, was not legally entitled to occupy the flat he lived in.
The facts of this case and the findings of the ECIHR are identical to those in the cases of Ćosić v. Croatia and Paulić v. Croatia for which the Committee of Ministers adopted the final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)48 on its 1115 DH Meeting and closed the examination of the cases.
Under Article 428a of the Croatian Code of Civil Procedure, following the final judgment of the Court, the applicant had the right to file a petition for the reopening of die proceedings. The deadline for filing such a petition expired on October 21 2011. The applicant did not file a petition for reopening of proceedings. Therefore, no individual measures are necessary nor possible.
The judgment has been translated into Croatian language and disseminated to all relevant authorities — the Constitutional Court of RoC, the Supreme Court, the County Court in Rijeka, the Municipal Court in Rijeka, Attorney General’s Office and the Ministry of Justice.
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia on December 22 2010 (decision no. U
‑
III-46/2007) enhanced its practice regarding the right to respect of one’s home. The facts of the 0rlić case occurred before the Constitutional Court’s change of practice.
The change of Constitutional Court’s practice was considered to be an adequate general measure in the Ćosić and Paulić cases.
Since the facts of this case are identical to those of Ćosić and Paulić cases, the Government would like to refer to the action report in the cases of Ćosić v. Croatia, and Paulić v. Croatia and the final Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)48 adopted at the 1115DH Meeting with which the examination of Ćosić and Paulić cases was closed.
Just satisfaction awarded to the applicant has been paid on November 28. 2011, and payment information on a prescribed form delivered to the Execution’s department on November 5, 2011.
The Government deems that all necessary measures for the execution of the judgment in this case have been taken, and therefore proposes to the Committee of Ministers the closure of the execution supervision procedure. and the adoption of a final resolution (Article 46 paragraph 2 of the Convention in relation to Rule 17 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements).
[1]
Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 8 mars 2012 lors de la 1136e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.
[2]
voir aussi les recommandations adoptées par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la supervision des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, et en particulier la Recommandation
Rec(2004)6 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats membres sur l'amélioration des recours internes.
[3]
Document en anglais uniquement