Lesjak împotriva Croației

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 12 [1] Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Lesjak împotriva Croației Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumită în continuare "CEDO"). Convenția mai jos [2] Având în vedere hotărârea de mai jos, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului odată ce a devenit definitiv Numele cauzei (ref.

in) Hotărârea Definitivului Lesjak (25904/06) 18/02/2010 18/05/2010 Reamintind că constatările de încălcare făcute de Curte impun, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate în hotărâri, adoptarea de către statul membru pârât, dacă este necesar, a unor măsuri individuale care să pună capăt încălcărilor și să șteargă, pe cât posibil, consecințele acestora pentru solicitant, precum și măsuri generale care să permită prevenirea unor încălcări similare; După ce a invitat autoritățile din statul pârât să furnizeze un plan de acțiune privind măsurile propuse pentru executarea hotărârii; după ce a examinat, în conformitate cu normele Comitetului privind aplicarea articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție, bilanțul de acțiune furnizat de guvern (a se vedea bilanțul de acțiune, documentul DD(2011) 322 [3] după ce a luat act de faptul că Statul pârât le-a acordat părților reclamante satisfacția echitabilă prevăzută în hotărârea pronunțată; DECURSĂ că acesta și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE de la: la examen.

ACȚIUNE REPORT on individual and general measures undertaken in the execution of ECTHR judgment in the case of Lesjak v. Croatia, application no. 25904/06; judgment of February 18 2010, final on May 18 2010 In its judgment of February 18 2010, the ECTHR found a încălcarea articolului 6 alineatul (1) din Convenție, datorate to thefact that both civil and administratives red to examin the merits of the aplicants The Court ruled that, since neither the civil nor the Administrative Scurte ruled on the lawfulness of the termination of his workment, the esence of applicicants right of access to scurt was denied. 1. INDIVIDUAL MEASURI On February 22 2011, the Municipal Court in Varaždin granted the applicant Reopening of proceedings, as stated in § 54 of the judgment, presents the most redress for the breach of the convention.

Since the Government has fulèreid this duty, no other individual measures seem necessary.GENERAL MEASSURIs The judgment joss been widely disseminated, both to the highest scurts in Croatia - the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court and the Administrator Court, as well as to the County and the Municipal Courts in Varaždin, which conducted the initial proceedings on the applicants claim. Additionally, the translation of the judgment has been publicshed on the web page of the Ministry of Justice http://www.mprh.hr/Default.asp?sec=446).

JUST SATISFACȚION As the Government has informed the Committee of Ministers in its letter of August 27 2010, just satisfaction awarded to the aplicant has been paid in full on July 8 2010. Considering the fast that the încălcarea found by ECTHR in this case presents an izolated incident, where domestic scurts failed to properly applications of domestic laws, the Government deems that no other individual or general measures are necessary. Therefore, the Government of Croatia propus the cloud of the execution proceseedings and the a final resolution (art. 46 paragraph 2 of the Convention in relation to Rule 17 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements).

Štefica Stažnik Government Agent [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 8 martie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1136-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] A se vedea, de asemenea, recomandările adoptate de Comitetul miniștrilor în cadrul supravegherii hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului, în special Recomandarea Rec(2004)6 a Comitetului de Miniștri al statelor membre privind îmbunătățirea acțiunilor interne. [3] Numai în limba engleză.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)12 [1] Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Lesjak contre Croatie Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées « la Convention » et « la Cour ») [2] , Vu l’arrêt ci-dessous, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité une fois qu’il est devenu définitif ; Nom de l’affaire (réf.

requête) Arrêt du Définitif le Lesjak (25904/06) 18/02/2010 18/05/2010 Rappelant que les constats de violation faits par la Cour exigent, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée dans les arrêts, l’adoption par l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire, de mesures individuelles mettant fin aux violations et effaçant autant que possible les conséquences de celles-ci pour le requérant, et de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ; Ayant invité les autorités de l’Etat défendeur à fournir un plan d’action concernant les mesures proposées pour exécuter l’arrêt; Ayant examiné, conformément aux Règles du Comité pour l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention, le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement (voir bilan d’action, document DH ‑ DD(2011)322 [3] ) ; Ayant noté que l’Etat défendeur a versé aux parties requérantes la satisfaction équitable prévue dans l’arrêt ; DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

ACTION REPORT

on individual and general measures undertaken in the execution of ECtHR judgment in the case of Lesjak v. Croatia, application no. 25904/06, judgment of February 18 2010, final on May 18 2010 In its judgment of February 18 2010, the ECtHR found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, due to the fact that both civil and administrative courts refused to examine the merits of the applicants’ case. The Court ruled that, since neither the civil nor the Administrative court ruled on the lawfulness of the termination of his employment, the essence of applicant’s right of access to court was denied.

1. INDIVIDUAL MEASURES

On February 22 2011, the Municipal court in Varaždin granted the applicant’s request for reopening of proceedings based on the ECtHR judgment. The hearing was continued on the same day, and resumed on March 29 2011, when parties to the proceedings requested leave in order to try to achieve a settlement. The next hearing is scheduled for April 29, 2011. Reopening of proceedings, as stated in § 54 of the judgment, presents the most appropriate redress for the breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. Since the Government has fulfilled this duty, no other individual measures seem necessary.

GENERAL MEASURES

The judgment bas been widely disseminated, both to the highest courts in Croatia - the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court and the Administrative Court, as well as to the County and the Municipal Courts in Varaždin, which conducted the initial proceedings on the applicants claim. Additionally, the translation of the judgment has been published on the web page of the Ministry of justice ( http://www.mprh.hr/Default.aspx?sec=446).

JUST SATISFACTION

As the Government has informed the Committee of Ministers in its letter of August 27 2010, just satisfaction awarded to the applicant has been paid in full on July 8 2010. Considering the fast that the violation found by ECtHR in this case presents an isolated incident, where domestic courts failed to properly apply provisions of domestic laws, the Government deems that no other individual or general measures are necessary. Therefore, the Government of Croatia proposes the closure of the execution proceedings and the adoption of a final resolution (Article 46 paragraph 2 of the Convention in relation to Rule 17 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements).

Štefica Stažnik Government Agent [1] Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 8 mars 2012 lors de la 1136e réunion des Délégués des Ministres. [2] voir aussi les recommandations adoptées par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la supervision des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, et en particulier la Recommandation Rec(2004)6 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats membres sur l'amélioration des recours internes. [3] Document en anglais uniquement.