AFFAIRE WELLER CONTRE LA HONGRIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)189 [1] Lajos Weller împotriva Ungariei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 44399/05, Hotărârea din 31/03/2009, definitivă la 30/06/2009) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 879E [2] care reamintește obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum ; și măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 879E) ; cu asigurarea faptului că au fost adoptate toate măsurile impuse prin art. 46 alineatul (1) DECLARĂ qual își îndeplinește funcțiile în temeiul art. 46 alin. (2) din Convenție în acest caz și DECIDE d . Amended Acțiune Report of 5 April 2012 App. No. 44399/05 Lajos Weller, judgement of 31/03/2009 Introductory case summary The aplicants, Lajos Weller, and his twin sons, Danniel and Máté Weller complained - relying on Article 14 (prohibiție de discriminare) taken together with Article 8 (right to respect for privat and family life) - that they had been refuzed maternity Benefits in 2005 ciocause the mother of the children had not been elgible on account of her naționality. The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had, - in respect of all applicants - been a încălcarea, of Article 14 taken together with Article 8 of the Convention. I. Individual measures Doar satisfaction awarded to the aplicants was paid on 25 August 2009 in sum of 851,622 HUF. The Court awarded the aplicants, jointly, EUR 1,500 in respect of non pecuniary damage and EUR 950 for costs and expenses. In respect of pecuniary damage the Court awarded the applicants the entirety of the sum requested under this head, i.e. joinly HUF 179,719 (approximately EUR 720), which sum sum se potrivește to the actual loss originating from the refuzal of maternity benefits, plus interesst. No further individual measures are necessary in the execution procesion. II. General Measures The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was publicished on the website of the Government (www.kormany.hu The Government mirose the judgement to the Ministry of National Resources in order to information the relevant authority about the content of the judgment and to modify the Act no. 84 of 1998 on Family Support. The Section 29 of the Act was amended with a new (3) paragraph which extended the scop of the Act for every woman legiding in Hungary (see Act no. 171 of 2010, section 79 and Act no. 201 of 2011, section 173/d). No further general measures were considered necessary, ciocause similar problems can bevoided due to the change in the Act. III. Concluzii of the respondent state The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecvences for the aplicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has compliment with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention. Budapest, 18 September 2012 Zoltán Tallódi Agent of the Government of Hungary [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 6 decembrie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1157-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)189

[1]

Lajos Weller contre Hongrie

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

44399/05, arrêt du 31/03/2009, définitif le 30/06/2009)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)879E

)

[2]

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)879E

) ;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Amended action Report of 5 April 2012

Appl. No. 44399/05

Lajos Weller, judgement of 31/03/2009

Introductory case summary

The applicants,

Lajos

Weller, and his twin sons, Dániel and Máté

Weller complained - relying on Article

14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken together with Article

8 (right to respect for private and family life) - that they had been refused maternity benefits in 2005 because the mother of the children had not been eligible on account of her nationality. The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had, - in respect of all applicants - been a violation, of Article

14 taken together with Article

8 of the Convention.

I. Individual measures

Just satisfaction awarded to the applicants was paid on 25 August 2009 in sum of 851,652

HUF. The Court awarded the applicants, jointly, EUR

1,500 in respect of non

‑

pecuniary damage and EUR

950 for costs and expenses. In respect of pecuniary damage the Court awarded the applicants the entirety of the sum requested under this head, i.e. jointly HUF

179,719 (approximately EUR

720), which sum corresponds to the actual loss originating from the refusal of maternity benefits, plus interest.

No further individual measures are necessary in the execution process.

II. General measures

The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was published on the website of the Government (

www.kormany.hu

).

The Government sent the judgement to the Ministry of National Resources in order to inform the relevant authority about the content of the judgment and to modify the Act no. 84 of 1998 on Family Support.

The Section 29 of the Act was amended with a new (3) paragraph which extended the scope of the Act for every woman legally residing in Hungary (see Act no. 171 of 2010, Section 79 and Act no. 201 of 2011, Section 173/d).

No further general measures were considered necessary, because similar problems can be avoided due to the change in the Act.

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The Government consider that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Budapest, 18 September 2012

Zoltán Tallódi

Agent of the Government of Hungary

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais uniquement