AFFAIRE KÁROLY HEGEDŰS CONTRE LA HONGRIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 192 [1] Károly Hegedűs împotriva Ungariei Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (Recherche n 11849/07, Hotărârea din 03/11/2011, definitivă la 03/02/2012/) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumite în continuare "menționate mai jos " Convenția" și "Curtea"), Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcările constatate (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)1027E care reamintește obligația de a se pronunța, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (CE) nr. (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in integrum de măsuri generale de prevenire a unor încălcări similare ; Am invitat guvernul statului pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012)1027E SÕ, asigurându-se că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL qual a îndeplinit funcțiile care îi revin în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d The Court found violation of the applicicants right to a fair trial due to the excesiv length of criminal proceedings of over furteen years [art. 6 alineatul (1) ] and violation of is right to peaceful enjoyment of his posesions datored to the attachment of his assets throughout almost the entire period of time (art. 1 of Protocol No. 1); aplicantul regined the right of disponibil over these asets when el a fost finally achitat in September 2006. I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures Just satisfaction for moraly damage sustained (19,000 EUR) as well as for costs and expenses (2,300 EUR) was paid to the applicant on time (Sum due: 21,300 EUR; Payment deadline: 03/06/2012; Date of payment: 25/04/2012; Amunt paid: 6,360,180 HUF; Exchange rate: 298.60). No further individual measures were considered necessary, ciocause the applicant regiained the right of disposal over is asets in September 2006. II. General Measures The judgment has been publicished on the website of the Government (see: http://igazsagugyiinformaciok.kormany.hu/az-emberi-jogok-europai-birosaganak-iteletei) and was simte to the National Office of the Judiciary and the Attorney General for disemination amongst the judicial and prosecution authorities. It is resalled that the issues relating to viols of Article 6 due to the excesiv length of proceseed are examined by the Committee of Ministers within the context of the Tímár group of cases. As as the violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of depositions (art. 1 of Protocol No. 1), it should be noted that the origin of this violation is to be found in the excesiv length of the criminal proceedings. for the duration of the criminal procedeedings, the aplicant was prohibited from alianating his asets in order to secure the eventual recovery of the câștig from the alleged infraction. The Court did not call into question the measure of freeezing the applicicants asets in itself but only insofar as it lasted too long and thereby upset the balance between the individual interesst of the aplicant and the requirements of the general interest (see § 26 of the judgment). The general measures required in this respect are thus identical with those to address the general problem of the excesiv length of Judicial proceedings (see above). III. Concluzii of the respondent state The Government considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecvences for the aplicant of the violation found by the Court in this case and that Hungary has commised with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Convention. Budapest, 5 November 2012 Zoltán Tallódi Agent for the Government of Hungary [1] Adoptată de Comitetul de Miniștri la 6 decembrie 2012 cu ocazia celei de-a 1157-a reuniuni a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Numai în limba engleză.

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)192

[1]

Károly Hegedűs contre Hongrie

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

(Requête n

o

11849/07, arrêt du 03/11/2011, définitif le 03/02/2012)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et les violations constatées (voir document

DH-DD(2012)1027E

)

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in integrum

;

et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnées

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)1027E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action Report of 5 November 2012

Appl. No. 11849/07

Károly Hegedus v. Hungary judgment of 03/11/2011

[2]

Introductory case summary

The Court found violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial due to the excessive length of criminal proceedings of over fourteen years (Article 6 § 1) and violation of his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions due to the attachment of his assets throughout almost the entire period of time (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1); the applicant regained the right of disposal over these assets when he was finally acquitted in September 2006.

I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures

Just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage sustained (19,000 EUR) as well as for costs and expenses (2,300 EUR) was paid to the applicant on time (Sum due: 21,300 EUR; Payment deadline: 03/06/2012; Date of payment: 25/04/2012; Amount paid: 6,360,180 HUF; Exchange rate: 298.60). No further individual measures were considered necessary, because the applicant regained the right of disposal over his assets in September 2006.

II. General measures

The judgment has been published on the website of the Government (see: http://igazsagugyiinformaciok.kormany.hu/az-emberi-jogok-europai-birosaganak-iteletei) and was sent to the National Office of the Judiciary and the Attorney General for dissemination amongst the judicial and prosecution authorities.

It is recalled that the issues relating to violations of Article 6 due to the excessive length of proceedings are examined by the Committee of Ministers within the context of the Tímár group of cases.

As regards the violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1), it should be noted that the origin of this violation is to be found in the excessive length of the criminal proceedings. For the duration of the criminal proceedings, the applicant was prohibited from alienating his assets in order to secure the eventual recovery of the gain from the alleged crime. The Court did not call into question the measure of freezing the applicant’s assets in itself but only insofar as it lasted too long and thereby upset the balance between the individual interest of the applicant and the requirements of the general interest (see § 26 of the judgment). The general measures required in this respect are thus identical with those to address the general problem of the excessive length of judicial proceedings (see above).

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The Government considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation found by the Court in this case and that Hungary has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Budapest, 5 November 2012

Zoltán Tallódi

Agent for the Government of Hungary

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 décembre 2012 lors de la 1157e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

En anglais seulement.