AFFAIRE SZEPESI CONTRE LA HONGRIE

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012)92 [1] Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Szepesi împotriva Ungariei (Recherche n 7983/06, Hotărârea din 21 decembrie 2010, definitivă la 21 martie 2011) Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că: Având în vedere hotărârea definitivă, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului în cauza de mai sus și încălcarea constatată (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 387E [2] care reamintește obligația statului pârât, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (3) (1) din Convenție, să se conformeze hotărârilor definitive în litigiile la care este parte și că această obligație implică, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte, adoptarea de către autoritățile din statul membru în cauză, dacă este necesar de măsuri individuale pentru a pune capăt încălcărilor constatate și pentru a elimina consecințele acestora, în măsura posibilului de către Restitutio in intergrom ; și măsuri generale pentru prevenirea unor încălcări similare ; invitând guvernul de la național pârât să informeze Comitetul cu privire la măsurile luate pentru a se conforma obligațiilor menționate anterior După examinarea bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern care indică măsurile adoptate în vederea executării hotărârii judecătorești, inclusiv informațiile furnizate în ceea ce privește plata satisfacției echitabile acordate de Curte (a se vedea documentul DH-DD(2012) 387E FIȘĂ fiind asigurat că au fost adoptate toate măsurile prevăzute la art. 46 alineatul (1); DECLAMENTUL CHILLULUI și-a îndeplinit atribuțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție în această cauză și DECIDE d . Action Report of 19 August 2011 App. No. 7983/06 Szepesi, judgment of 21/12/2010 (Revised) Introductory case summary The aplicant, Tibor Szepesi, is a Hungarian national who was born in 1966 and lives in Budapesta. Relying on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) he complained that he had been kept in detention on remand for three years on drug-trafficking acuzations. He was found guilty in September 2008 and sended to șase years The Court found that this ten-month period of inactivity was ireconciliable with the cesionite Satisfacție echitabilă rewarded to the applicant was paid on 21 April 2011 (moraly damage 4800 €, 1269874 HUF). The excesiv time spent in pre-trial detention was taken into account by the scurt simtencing the applicant to 6 years of imprisonment (see § 19 of the judgment). Therefore no further individual meas are necessary in the execution procesion. II. General Measures Publication and disemination The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was publicityshed on the website of the Government (www.kormany.hu The Government simte the judgment to the Office of the National Judicial Council in order to information the scurts about the content of the judgment and to take due account of the findings of the judgment in their viitoare practice. It should be recalled that the general measures referenting excesiv length of pre-trial detention were already adopted in the context of the cases of Imre, Maglódi, Csâky and Brarkanyi against Hungary (see Resolution CM/ResDH(2011) 2222). III. Concluzii of the respondent state The Government considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consecvences for the aplicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has commis compliment with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention. Budapest, 19 March 2012 Zoltan Tallódi Co-Agent of the Government of Hungary [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 6 iunie 2012 cu ocazia celei de-a 1144-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] Document numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)92

[1]

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

Szepesi contre Hongrie

(Requête n

o

7983/06, arrêt du 21 décembre 2010, définitif le 21 mars 2011)

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»)),

Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document

DH-DD(2012)387E

)

[2]

;

Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe

1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire

:

-

de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences,

dans la mesure du possible par

restitutio in intergrum

; et

-

de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnés

;

Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document

DH-DD(2012)387E

)

;

S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées

;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action Report of 19 August 2011

Appl. No. 7983/06

Szepesi, judgment of 21/12/2010 (Revised)

Introductory case summary

The applicant, Tibor Szepesi, is a Hungarian national who was born in 1966 and lives in Budapest. Relying on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) he complained that he had been kept in detention on remand for three years on drug-trafficking charges. He was found guilty in September 2008 and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. The Court found a violation in particular because although a bill of indictment was submitted on 05/07/2004, the trial only began on 09/05/2005. The Court found that this ten-month period of inactivity was irreconcilable with the requisite “special diligence” in such cases.

I.

Individual measures

Just satisfaction rewarded to the applicant was paid on 21 April 2011 (non-pecuniary damage 4800 €, 1269874 HUF). The excessive time spent in pre-trial detention was taken into account by the court sentencing the applicant to 6 years of imprisonment (see § 19 of the judgment). Therefore no further individual measures are necessary in the execution process.

II.

General measures

Publication and dissemination

The decision was translated and the Hungarian version was published on the website of the Government (

www.kormany.hu

).

The Government sent the judgment to the Office of the National Judicial Council in order to inform the courts about the content of the judgment and to take due account of the findings of the judgment in their future practice.

It should be recalled that the general measures concerning excessive length of pre-trial detention were already adopted in the context of the cases of Imre, Maglódi, Csâky and Bârkânyi against Hungary (see Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)222).

III.

Conclusions of the respondent state

The Government considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case, and that Hungary has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, Paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Budapest, 19 March 2012

Zoltân Tallódi

Co-Agent of the

Government of Hungary

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 6 juin 2012 lors de la 1144e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

Document en anglais uniquement