ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.02.2015 Auto

CASE OF ILONA KOVÁCS v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
17.02.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
CASE OF ILONA KOVÁCS v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Reclamantul s-a născut în 1960 și locuiește în Budapesta. La 1 septembrie 2006, reclamantul a interzis o acțiune împotriva Oficiului primarului districtului Budapesta XIV care a contestat o decizie administrativă prin care a fost revocat documentul de înmatriculare al mașinii sale. La 10 septembrie 2010, Curtea Regională de Budapesta a adoptat o hotărâre finală care a anulat decizia administrativă în cauză. Se pare că procedurile administrative care au urmat să fie reeliberate documentul de înregistrare au fost așteptate încă de atunci.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2007-10-23
0,91
CASE OF KOVACS v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1937 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 11 March 1996 the applicant brought an action in the Pest Central District Court, seeking the judicial review of a resolution adopted by the community of owners of the building
CtEDO 2011-03-15
0,88
CASE OF LASZLO MOLNAR v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 15 September 1989 the applicant brought an action against a private individual before the Pest Central District Court, seeking to recover the possession of some specific movable
CtEDO 2015-02-17
0,88
CASE OF NÉMETH v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Budapest. 5. In March 2003 the applicant brought an action against Budapest IX District Municipality, claiming the release of public information in the context of a real estate dispute. So far
CtEDO 2014-07-08
0,88
CASE OF BENKŐ AND SOÓSNÉ BENKŐ v. HUNGARY
5. The applicant was born in 1937 and lived in Budapest. 6. On 23 April 2002 she brought an action before the Budapest XX/XXI/XXIII District Court, seeking the dissolution of common ownership. 7. On 22 November 2007 the Budapest Regional Co
CtEDO 2016-10-04
0,88
CASE OF MÁTYUS v. HUNGARY
4. The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Budapest. 5. On 6 January 2000 the applicant brought an action against his parents before the Siófok District Court for dissolution of joint ownership of a real property. 6. On 21 March 2000 th
Sursă