CtEDO 03.09.2015 Auto

M. and M. v. Croatia

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
03.09.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
M. and M. v. Croatia (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Investigare eficace) (aspecte procedurale);Nici o încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Obligații pozitive);Nr o încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Obligațiile de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Respectarea vieții familiale);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de respectare a vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8 - Respectarea vieții familiale); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,99
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,98
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,97
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive oblig
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,95
Matanović v. Croatia
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2021-11-18
0,95
M.H. and Others v. Croatia
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture
Sursă