CtEDO 03.09.2015 AI

CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER

RESPONDENT
HRV
HOTĂRÂRE
03.09.2015
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2015
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian translation] legal summary by the SCM Romania and IER (CtEDO, 2015)
HUDOC · oficial

Cererea declarată inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Investigație efectivă) (Aspect procedural);Nicio încălcare a articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (Articolul 3 - Obligații pozitive);Nicio încălcare a articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familiară (Articolul 8 - Obligații pozitive);Încălcarea articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familiară (Articolul 8 - Obligații pozitive; Articolul 8-1 - Respect pentru viața familiară; Respect pentru viața privată);Încălcarea articolului 8 - Dreptul la respect pentru viața privată și familiară (Articolul 8-1 - Respect pentru viața familiară);Daune nemateriale - acordare (Articolul 41 - Daune nemateriale)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,99
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive oblig
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,99
CASE OF M. AND M. v. CROATIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2015-09-03
0,98
M. and M. v. Croatia
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations);No violation of Article 8
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,95
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2017-04-04
0,95
CASE OF MATANOVIĆ v. CROATIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to
Sursă