CtEDO 26.04.2016 Auto

CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
26.04.2016
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2016
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (CtEDO, 2016)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistant inadmisibil;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect substanțial);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Investigare eficientă) (aspect de procedură);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Privare a libertății;arestarea legală sau detenție;Procedură prescrisă de lege);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și a vieții familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectul pentru locuință privată); prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2016-04-26
0,99
CASE OF AMARANDEI AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violatio
CtEDO 2016-05-31
0,96
CASE OF COMORAȘU v. ROMANIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation
CtEDO 2015-01-13
0,96
CASE OF IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Pro
CtEDO 2016-05-31
0,96
CASE OF COMORAȘU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation
CtEDO 2016-01-12
0,96
CASE OF BOACĂ AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigat
Sursă