Chechłacz și alte 7 cauze împotriva Poloniei

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2016)260 Execuția hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Opt cazuri împotriva cererii nr. Cauza de la Hotărârea 43898/14 Krzysztof CHECHČACZ 15/12/2015 33558/14 Marek CHUSTECKI 24/11/2015 53811/13 Kamil Marcin GARDOCKI 08/12/2015 11361/15 Grzegorz KACPURA 20/10/2015 25128/15 Piotr KOZṣOWSKI 05/01/2016 46536/14 Marianna PONIEWIERSKA 05/01/2016 1389/15 Tomasz RATAJCZAK 09/02/2016 72817/14 Grzegorz TALIPSKI 26/01/2016 (Adoptat de Comitetul Miniștrilor la 21 septembrie 2016 la reuniunea de către miniștri în cadrul acestor decizii) Comitetul de miniștri, în conformitate cu art. 39 alineatul (4) din Convenția pentru protecția drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că se supraveghează executarea unor aședințe prietene, astfel cum au apărut în cadrul acestor decizii ale Curții.

Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)260 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Eight cases against Poland Application No. Case Date of the decision 43898/14 Krzysztof CHECHŁACZ 15/12/2015 33558/14 Marek CHUSTECKI 24/11/2015 53811/13 Kamil Marcin GARDOCKI 08/12/2015 11361/15 Grzegorz KACPURA 20/10/2015 25128/15 Piotr KOZŁOWSKI 05/01/2016 46536/14 Marianna PONIEWIERSKA 05/01/2016 1389/15 Tomasz RATAJCZAK 09/02/2016 72817/14 Grzegorz TALIPSKI 26/01/2016 (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 September 2016 at the 1265 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”), Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State, DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and DECIDES to close their examination.