CtEDO 07.02.2017 Auto

İrfan Güzel v. Turkey

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
07.02.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
İrfan Güzel v. Turkey (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Restul inadmisibil (art. 35-3-a – Manifest nefondat);Nici o încălcare a articolului 8 – Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie (art. 8-1 – Respectul de corespondență;Respectul de viață privată);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+8 – Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 – Remediare eficace) (art. 8-1 – Respectul de corespondență;Aspectul de viață privată;art. 8 – Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și viața de familie); Prejudiciu material - respingere (art. 41 – Prejudiciu material;Dar satisfacție); Prejudiciu material morale - constatarea încălării suficiente (art. 41 – Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,98
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,96
CASE OF İRFAN GÜZEL v. TURKEY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,96
Karabeyoğlu v. Turkey
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect
CtEDO 2016-06-07
0,96
CASE OF KARABEYOĞLU v. TURKEY
Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect
CtEDO 2017-02-07
0,95
İrfan Güzel c. Turquie
Partiellement irrecevable (Article 35-3-a - Manifestement mal fondé);Non-violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la correspondance;Respect de la vie privée);Violation de l'article
Sursă