CtEDO 28.11.2017 Auto

N. v. Romania

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
28.11.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Speediness of review);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
N. v. Romania (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistarea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau deținerea;Procedură prescrisă de lege;art. 5-1-e - Persoanele cu minte nesensibilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Garanțiile procedurale de reexaminare; Vechitatea de revizuire); Statul pârât să ia măsuri individuale (art. 46-2 - Măsuri individuale); Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46-2 - Măsuri generale);Distrugerea pecuniară - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-11-28
1,00
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,99
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art 35-1) Four-month period (former six-month);(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1
CtEDO 2017-11-28
0,99
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or
CtEDO 2017-02-28
0,95
CASE OF BIVOLARU v. ROMANIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,95
Association ACCEPT and Others v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
Sursă