CtEDO 19.12.2017 AI

CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
PRT
HOTĂRÂRE
19.12.2017
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2017
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2017)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară conexată pe fond și respingă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei; Nicio încălcare a Articolului 2 - Dreptul la viață (Articolul 2 - Obligații pozitive; Articolul 2-1 - Viață) (Aspect substanțial); Încălcare a Articolului 2 - Dreptul la viață (Articolul 2-1 - Investigație efectivă) (Aspect procedural); Prejudiciu patrimonial - cerere respingă (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial; Satisfacție echitabilă); Prejudiciu moral - acordare (Articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-12-19
0,98
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);
CtEDO 2017-12-19
0,97
Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC]
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);
CtEDO 2018-11-06
0,94
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility
CtEDO 2017-12-19
0,94
AFFAIRE LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;Non-violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2 - Obligations positives;Article 2-1 - Vie) (Volet matériel)
CtEDO 2018-01-09
0,93
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
Sursă