CtEDO 12.04.2018 AI

CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
12.04.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Celelalte inadmisibile (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Fără încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Fără încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Audiere corectă);Prejudiciu patrimonial - claim respinge (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial;Satisfacție echitabilă);Prejudiciu moral - finding of violation sufficient (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,98
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
CtEDO 2018-04-12
0,98
Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - R
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,95
CASE OF BIELIŃSKI v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6 - Right to a
CtEDO 2018-10-02
0,94
CASE OF MUTU AND PECHSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tr
CtEDO 2018-02-01
0,94
CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat
Sursă