CtEDO
12.04.2018
AI
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
RESPONDENT
POL
HOTĂRÂRE
12.04.2018
Pe scurt
- Instanță
- CtEDO
- Concluzie
- Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
Citează această cauză
CASE OF CHIM AND PRZYWIECZERSKI v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
Celelalte inadmisibile (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Fără încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Fără încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (articolul 6 - Proceduri penale;articolul 6-1 - Audiere corectă);Prejudiciu patrimonial - claim respinge (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu patrimonial;Satisfacție echitabilă);Prejudiciu moral - finding of violation sufficient (articolul 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Satisfacție echitabilă)
§ Cauze similare
5 cauze