CtEDO 13.03.2025 Auto

CASE OF VYACHESLAVOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of Agent before the European Court of Human Rights

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
13.03.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF VYACHESLAVOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of Agent before the European Court of Human Rights (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menținerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Pronunțat nefondat;Încălcarea articoluluiui 2 - Dreptul la viață (art. 2 - Obligații pozitive;art. 2-1 - Viața de viață);Încălcarea articoluluiui 2 - Dreptul la viața de viață (art. 2 - Obligații pozitive;art. 2-1 - Investigare eficientă) (aspectul procedural);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul la respectarea vieții private și familiale (art. 8-1 - Respectulta pentru viața de familie;Respectul vieții private); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darcarea)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-03-13
0,99
CASE OF VYACHESLAVOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2025-02-13
0,97
CASE OF DENYSYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of Agent before the European Court of Human Right
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondenc
CtEDO 2025-03-27
0,97
CASE OF BILYAVSKA v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of Agent before the European Court of Human Right
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obli
CtEDO 2025-02-13
0,96
CASE OF DENYSYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondenc
CtEDO 2021-10-14
0,95
CASE OF LYSYUK v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation
Sursă