CtEDO 26.06.2018 AI

CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
26.06.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară unită pe fond și respinsă (Art. 34) Cererile individuale; (Art. 34) Victimă; Obiecție preliminară unită pe fond și respinsă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei; Restul inadmisibil (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestă lipsă de temei; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; Restul inadmisibil (Art. 34) Cererile individuale; (Art. 34) Victimă; Încălcarea Articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (Articolul 6 - Proceduri civile; Articolul 6-1 - Proces echitabil; Tribunal imparțial; Tribunal independent); Nicio încălcare a Articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietății (Articolul 1 alineatul 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Privarea de proprietate; Exercitarea pașnică a drepturilor de proprietate); Daune patrimoniale - cerere respinsă (Articolul 41 - Daune patrimoniale; Satisfacție echitabilă)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,98
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder ina
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,97
Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v. Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder ina
CtEDO 2019-10-17
0,94
CASE OF POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rig
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,94
AFFAIRE INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION c. UKRAINE
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;Partiellement ir
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,94
Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union c. Ukraine
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;Partiellement ir
Sursă