CtEDO 26.06.2018 Auto

Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v. Ukraine

RESPONDENT
UKR
HOTĂRÂRE
26.06.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v. Ukraine (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victima;Obiecţia preliminară a aderat la meritul şi a respins (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) În mod evident nefondat; menținerea inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifest nefondat; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victima;Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă;Tribunal imperial;Tribunal independent);Nici o încălcare a articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Deprivarea proprietăţilor; Disfrutarea păcii a bunurilor); leziuni pecuniare - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Leziuni pecuniare;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,99
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder ina
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,97
CASE OF INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION v. UKRAINE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder ina
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,96
Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union c. Ukraine
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;Partiellement ir
CtEDO 2018-06-26
0,94
AFFAIRE INDUSTRIAL FINANCIAL CONSORTIUM INVESTMENT METALLURGICAL UNION c. UKRAINE
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestement mal fondé;Partiellement ir
CtEDO 2021-07-22
0,94
CASE OF GUMENYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fa
Sursă