CtEDO 17.07.2018 Auto

CASE OF SANDU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
17.07.2018
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);No violation of Article 13+P1-1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 13+P1-1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2018
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SANDU AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2018)
HUDOC · oficial

Ieşiţi din listă (Art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1-a) Absența intenției de a continua aplicarea; (Art. 37-1-c) Examinarea continuă nu este justificată;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Rationne personae;Nici o încălcare a articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Russia); Nicio încălcare a articolului 13+P1-1-1 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor;art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+P1-1-1 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor;art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracţie paşnică a bunurilor (Russia); leziuni pecuniare şi morale - atribuire (art. 41 - leziuni morale; leziuni pecuniare;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-07-17
0,94
AFFAIRE SANDU ET AUTRES c. LA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET LA RUSSIE
Radiation du rôle (Art. 37) Radiation du rôle-{général};(Art. 37-1-a) Absence d'intention de maintenir la requête;(Art. 37-1-c) Poursuite de l'examen non justifiée;Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a)
CtEDO 2018-10-16
0,94
CASE OF ZHIDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Artic
CtEDO 2021-09-14
0,93
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article 2+3 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion;
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,93
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,93
CASE OF VĂLEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1-b) Matter resolved;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Prote
Sursă