CtEDO 20.02.2024 Auto

CASE OF LYPOVCHENKO AND HALABUDENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
20.02.2024
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-a - Conviction) (Russia);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-a - Conviction) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Tribunal established by law) (Russia);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Tribunal established by law) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property) (Russia);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Russia);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Russia);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2024
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF LYPOVCHENKO AND HALABUDENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2024)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; (art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman; Obligații posibile) (Aspectul de susținere) (Russia);Nu are încălcarea articolului 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inuman; Obligații de susținere) (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul de libertate și securitate (art. 5-1 - Arestarea legală sau detenție;Procedură prescrisă prin lege;art. 5-1-A - Conviction) (Russia);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul de la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul penal;art. 6-1 - Audierea justă a Legii; art. 5-1 -Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăţilor (Rusia); Nicio încălcare a art. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 alin. 2 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Controlul utilizării proprietăţilor (Republica Moldova);Violaţia art. 2 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulație-{general} (Rusia); Nicio încălcare a articolului 2 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Libertatea de circulaţie-{general} (Republica Moldova);Violaţia art. 13 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediul eficace) (Russia);Nici o încălcare a art. 13 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediul eficace) (Republica Moldova);Nici o încălcare a art. 34 - Cerinţele individuale (art. 34 - Injurirea exercitării dreptului la cerere); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-02-20
0,95
AFFAIRE LYPOVCHENKO ET HALABUDENCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET RUSSIE
Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Articl
CtEDO 2017-05-09
0,95
CASE OF ERIOMENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman t
CtEDO 2004-07-08
0,95
CASE OF ILAȘCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation]
) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect)
CtEDO 2004-07-08
0,95
CASE OF ILAȘCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the P.A. "Lawyers for Human Rights"
olation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 -
CtEDO 2019-09-03
0,95
CASE OF DOBROVITSKAYA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia)
Sursă