ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 28.01.2020 Auto

PARTIYA PROGRESSA v. RUSSIA

RESPONDENT

RUS

HOTĂRÂRE

28.01.2020

Pe scurt

Instanță: CtEDO
Concluzie: Communicated

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

PARTIYA PROGRESSA v. RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2020)

HUDOC · oficial

Comunicat la 28 ianuarie 2020 Publicat la 17 februarie 2020 SECȚIUNEA TERZĂ Cerere nr. 54626/16 PARTIYA PROGRESSA împotriva Rusiei depusă la 12 septembrie 2016 OBIECTUL CAUZEI Cererea se referă la anularea înregistrării de stat a partidului politic reclamant, presupus fără justificare, cu consecință că nu ar putea prezenta membrii săi ca candidați în alegeri. A existat o încălcare a dreptului partidului reclamant în temeiul articolului 3 din Protocolul nr. 1 de a participa la alegerile libere care asigură libera exprimare a avizului poporului în alegerea legislaturii?

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2013-03-19

RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. RUSSIA

branch has been challenged before a court and the proceedings are still pending (section 15 § 7). For more details on legal provisions governing the status and activities of political parties, see the judgment in the case of Republican Part

CtEDO 2020-03-03

SVERDLOVSK REGIONAL BRANCH OF RUSSIAN LABOUR PARTY v. RUSSIA

THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 43724/05 SVERDLOVSK REGIONAL BRANCH OF RUSSIAN LABOUR PARTY against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 3 March 2020 as a Committee composed of: Paulo Pinto de Albuque

CtEDO 2016-04-27

POPOVA v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

annulment of his registration had been unlawful as the shortcomings imputed to him had not been grounds for his disqualification under the relevant domestic law, which contained an exhaustive list of such grounds; the court, however, reject

CtEDO 2003-09-09

PRESIDENTIAL PARTY OF MORDOVIA v. RUSSIA

to the State bodies and local government by nominating candidates and organising their electoral campaign, and taking part in the setting-up and activities of the said bodies.” COMPLAINT The applicant complains that the refusal to renew its

CtEDO 2018-02-23

DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA

Communicated on 23 February 2018 THIRD SECTION Application no. 7202/18 Elvira Rashitovna DMITRIYEVA against Russia lodged on 22 January 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The application concerns the applicant’s conviction of an administrative

Sursă