CtEDO 16.11.2021 Auto

N. v. Romania (no. 2)

RESPONDENT
ROU
HOTĂRÂRE
16.11.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Legislative amendments);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
N. v. Romania (no. 2) (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-2-b) Chestiunea deja examinată de Curte;Obiecția preliminară a aderat la fonduri și a respins (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private);Încălcarea articoluluiui 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie (art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții private); Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46-2 - Amendamente legislative); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-11-16
1,00
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2)
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the Court;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic rem
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,98
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
CtEDO 2021-11-16
0,98
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2) - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already examined by the
CtEDO 2020-02-11
0,96
Buturugă v. Romania
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3+8 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (
CtEDO 2020-02-11
0,96
CASE OF BUTURUGĂ v. ROMANIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3+8 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (
Sursă