CtEDO 18.01.2022 Auto

CASE OF DENISENKO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

RESPONDENT
MDA;RUS
HOTĂRÂRE
18.01.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Independent tribunal;Tribunal established by law) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Russia);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Independent tribunal;Tribunal established by law) (Russia)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF DENISENKO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Nicio încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Tribunal independent;Tribunal instituit prin lege) (Republica Moldova);Nici o încălcare a articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Republica Moldova);Încălcarea articoluluiui 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecția proprietăților (art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Disfrutarea pacifică a bunurilor (Rusia);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Tribunal independent;Tribunal instituit prin lege) (Rusia)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-01-18
0,97
AFFAIRE DENISENKO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA ET RUSSIE
Non-violation de l'article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure civile;Article 6-1 - Tribunal indépendant;Tribunal établi par la loi) (République de Moldova);Non-violation de l'article 1 du Protocole n° 1 - Protection de l
CtEDO 2021-09-28
0,95
CASE OF CRAVCIȘIN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1
CtEDO 2024-02-20
0,94
CASE OF LYPOVCHENKO AND HALABUDENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading tr
CtEDO 2021-07-13
0,94
CASE OF CILEI AND ROSIP v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);No vio
CtEDO 2021-04-27
0,93
CASE OF MÎRCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);
Sursă