CtEDO 27.11.2007 Auto

CASE OF POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA

RESPONDENT
MDA
HOTĂRÂRE
27.11.2007
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2007
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
CASE OF POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA (CtEDO, 2007)
HUDOC · oficial

Rezistare inadmisibilă;Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant;Tratament inhuman) (aspect substantiv);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - Raționalitate de detenție preventivă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura penală;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Încălcareabilitatea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6-2 - Presumarea inocencei);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 3 - Interzicerea torturiiului); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darticolul)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,99
CASE OF POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA - [Romanian Translation] by the P.A. "Lawyers for Human Rights"
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
CtEDO 2007-11-27
0,99
POPOVICI v. MOLDOVA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-tria
CtEDO 2012-01-19
0,95
CASE OF POPOV v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman trea
CtEDO 2017-05-30
0,95
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradin
CtEDO 2012-01-12
0,95
CASE OF TODOROV v. UKRAINE
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detent
Sursă