AFFAIRE JAFARLI ET AUTRES CONTRE L'AZERBAIDJAN

Rezoluția CM/ResDH(2012) 4 [1] Executarea hotărârii Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului Jafarli și altele împotriva Azerbaidjanului Comitetul miniștrilor, în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenția pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale, care prevede că el supraveghează executarea hotărârilor definitive ale Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului (denumită în continuare "convenția" și "Curtea") [2] Având în vedere hotărârea de mai jos, care a fost transmisă de Curte Comitetului odată ce a devenit definitiv Numele cauzei (referitor la cerere) Hotărârea Definitivului Le Jafarli și alții (36079/06) 29/07/2010 21/02/2011 Reamintind că constatările de încălcare făcute de Curte impun, pe lângă plata satisfacției echitabile acordate în hotărâri, adoptarea de către statul membru pârât, dacă este necesar, a unor măsuri individuale care să pună capăt încălcărilor și să șteargă, pe cât posibil, consecințele acestora pentru solicitant, precum și măsuri generale care să permită prevenirea unor încălcări similare; După ce a invitat autoritățile din statul membru în cauză să furnizeze un plan de acțiune privind măsurile propuse pentru executarea hotărârii; după examinarea, în conformitate cu normele Comitetului privind aplicarea articolului 46 alineatul (2) din convenție, a bilanțului de acțiune furnizat de guvern (a se vedea bilanțul de acțiune, documentul DD(2012)132 [3] - a se vedea mai jos) Statul pârât le-a acordat părților reclamante satisfacția echitabilă prevăzută în hotărârea pronunțată; DECLARĂ-I că și-a îndeplinit funcțiile în temeiul articolului 46 alineatul (2) din Convenție în această cauză și DECIDE de la . Acțiune Report Jafarli and others v. Azerbaijan Application nr. 36079/06 The Court held that the delay in the execution of the judgment of the Local Economic Court No. 1, datad 9 July 2002 was in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The aplicants did not submit a claim for just satisfaction and, acordingly, the Court considered that there was no call to award them any sum on that account. Individual measures In the period from March to August 2006, the judgment of Local Economic Court No. 1, datad 9 July 2002, was fully executed and the total amount of AZM 319,183,067 was paid into the bank account that the Cooperative held at the Kapital Bank. Thisfact has been acknowledged by the Court (§ 20 of the Judgment). The judgement has been translated and publicished in the The Mirzayev group of cases raporteaza to non-inforcement of the domestic scurt judgments referenting illegal ocupation by ID Ps of properties owned by other persons. The difficulties in forcement of such judgments raport to the larg number of IDPs (approximately 800,000) and the absence of infrastructure for their hinseg. The Government have already informed the Committee of Ministers about the actions undertaken in respect of these cases. The Tarverdiyev group of cases raporteaza to non-inforcement of domestic scurt judgments re-instating the applicants in their jobs. Defiliency of the enforcements of these rulings is due to dizolvation of the pozitions previously ocupants by the aplicants. In sum, these groups of cases raporteaza to systematic problems, which do not appear to exist in the present case, as its the bugetary assessment to single military unit in order to execute the relevant judgment. Accordingly, the Government ask the Committee of Ministers to close the examination of this case. [1] Adoptată de Comitetul miniștrilor la 8 martie 2012 în cadrul celei de-a 1136-a ședințe a delegaților miniștrilor. [2] A se vedea, de asemenea, recomandările adoptate de Comitetul miniștrilor în cadrul supravegherii hotărârilor Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului, în special Recomandarea Rec(2004)6 a Comitetului de Miniștri al statelor membre privind îmbunătățirea acțiunilor interne. [3] Numai în limba engleză

Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)4

[1]

Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme

Jafarli et autres contre Azerbaïdjan

Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «

la Convention

» et «

la Cour

»)

[2]

,

Vu l’arrêt ci-dessous, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité une fois qu’il est devenu définitif

;

Nom de l’affaire (réf. requête)

Arrêt du

Définitif le

Jafarli et autres (36079/06)

29/07/2010

21/02/2011

Rappelant que les constats de violation faits par la Cour exigent, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée dans les arrêts, l’adoption par l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire, de mesures individuelles mettant fin aux violations et effaçant autant que possible les conséquences de celles-ci pour le requérant, et de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;

Ayant invité les autorités de l’Etat défendeur à fournir un plan d’action concernant les mesures proposées pour exécuter l’arrêt;

Ayant examiné, conformément aux Règles du Comité pour l’application de l’article 46, paragraphe

2, de la Convention, le bilan d’action fourni par le gouvernement (voir bilan d’action, document

DH

‑

DD(2012)132

[3]

- voir ci-dessous)

;

Ayant noté que

l’Etat défendeur a versé aux parties requérantes la satisfaction équitable prévue dans l’arrêt ;

DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et

DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.

Action Report

Jafarli and others v. Azerbaijan

Application no. 36079/06

The Court held that the delay in the execution of the judgment of the Local Economic Court No. 1, dated 9 July 2002 was in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The applicants did not submit a claim for just satisfaction and, accordingly, the Court considered that there was no call to award them any sum on that account.

Individual measures

In the period from March to August 2006, the judgment of Local Economic Court No. 1, dated 9 July 2002, was fully executed and the total amount of AZM 319,183,067 was paid into the bank account that the Cooperative held at the Kapital Bank. This fact has been acknowledged by the Court (§ 20 of the Judgment).

General measures

The judgement has been translated and published in the “Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights” in Azerbaijani language.

It has to be noted that, among the cases concerning non-enforcement of domestic court judgments, two group of cases – group of Mirzayev cases and group of Tarverdiyev cases – are under enhanced supervision of the Committee of Ministers.

The Mirzayev group of cases relate to non-enforcement of the domestic court judgments concerning illegal occupation by ID Ps of properties owned by other persons. The difficulties in enforcement of such judgments relate to the large number of IDPs (approximately 800,000) and the absence of relevant infrastructure for their housing. The Government have already informed the Committee of Ministers about the actions undertaken in respect of these cases.

The Tarverdiyev group of cases relate to non-enforcement of domestic court judgments concerning re-instating the applicants in their jobs. Deficiency of the enforcements of these rulings is due to dissolution of the positions previously occupied by the applicants.

In sum, these groups of cases relate to systematic problems, which do not appear to exist in the present case, as it concerns the budgetary allocations to single military unit in order to execute the relevant judgment.

Accordingly, the Government ask the Committee of Ministers to close the examination of this case.

[1]

Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 8 mars 2012 lors de la 1136e réunion des Délégués des Ministres.

[2]

voir aussi les recommandations adoptées par le Comité des Ministres dans le cadre de la supervision des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, et en particulier la Recommandation

Rec(2004)6 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats membres sur l'amélioration des recours internes.

[3]

document en anglais uniquement